Even a blogger needs to eat. This blog is primarily Charles' hobby. But if he is intent on continuing to woo the Hooter's waitresses
in Chatanooga he needs something that pays.... wings don't come free you know. Here's a link to his
day job where he works the education beat
and, assuming he can't annoy enough people that way, is sometimes allowed to write opinion pieces.
Need perspective? Watson offers readers all they could possibly eat. For a unique view on current events, namely how they look from
orbit, here's Chuck's Real-Time(ish) Satellite Imagery of Areas of Interest.
Whenever it strikes his fancy, and there's good telemetry, Chuck will
process and post near real-time images of locations in the news. Eminently engrossing.
Wanna get into the head of a Japanese salaryman? Why, for Chis'sakes?! Well, assumin' you do, feel welcome to check out
the on-line journal of
Campbell's English class. Everyday, a group of disaffected salarymen are required to spill out their inner-most thoughts about life, the universe
and everything in broken English. Amazingly prosaic.
Shoutin' across the Pacific
Chiizu taberu koufuku shiteiru saru ga kangei-saremasen.
Tuesday, September 17, 2002 Big-Assed Sheep. Have you ever wondered why some sheep have muscular, oversized bottoms and some don't? Neither have I. But some scientists (who aren't even Scottish) have. Their discoveries could make it easier to determine whether syndromes such as schizophrenia and autism are genetically based.
North Korea finally admits it kidnapped Japanese citizens and has detained them for over 20 years. Tonight watching TV at the gym was a more surreal experience than usual. It was a split-screen affair: on one side you had Koizumi sitting at an ornate, mahogany table with gold-leafed edges trading professionally bound "notes of friendship" with the mangy hedgehog Kim Jong Il (who looked like he was wearing his best mechanic's jumpsuit and suffering a terminal case of bed-hair). On the other side you had a press conference of the families of Japanese citizens kidnapped by the PDRK in the 70s and 80s.
What has made this strange, relieving, unforgivable, .. is that Kim has finally admitted that these Japanese citizens, about 12 in all, were in fact taken by North Korean agents. There have been rumors about the missing, reports of sightings from defectors and it's been generally accepted that North Korea took them but now it's official. And, the second shoe to fall on this announcement, was that eight of them are dead.
Supposedly they died of natural causes.... while in North Korean captivity. But why they were kidnapped in the first place is ... unexplainable. All of the kidnapped were typical citizens between the ages of 16 and 45. Men and women from middle-class families who had no special talents or information or familial ties that would make them especially valuable to a foreign country. Some were abducted while traveling overseas in Europe but most were taken from Japanese soil by North Korean agents.
Why? What the hell was the point in this? The best answer is that the PDRK wanted to 'create' Japanese spies for their country. But how exactly would that work? Seduce them in the bosom of the worker's paradise and then release them back into Japan?? And they'll be beholden to the PDRK , why? Of course none of them ever were seen again in Japan.
I'm sure Kim had nothing to do with this personally. But it has been the major stumbling block to normalization with Japan for the last 20 years and sometime since he took over from dad he was briefed on this. He hoped the problem would go away, that the families would forget about their loved ones and both countries would move on. After all, the whole affair was so outlandish that it didn't even seem possible.
So here you have the PM of Japan shaking hands with Kim in Pyongyang and, at the same time on live TV, you have the families in Japan reservedly holding a press conference, demanding with quiet anger answers for the unanswerable and demands for apologies for the unforgivable.
To a person they were dressed in their best clothes. There were no displays of overwhelming emotion; no one brought pictures to hold before the cameras; no one raised their voice above speaking level. Yet the resentment and hatred were obvious, and justified.
Kim has added that the surviving abductees are now free to return to Japan "if they desire."
Akihiro Arimoto, the father of Keiko, has said that the impasse over the abductees has been tremendously frustrating.
"That's what's wrong with Japan," he said. "All the evidence was on the table - that she had been taken to North Korea.
"But for years no-one in the government would help - it was too sensitive for them."
Actually, the foreign ministry is counting this as a coup for Koizumi.
UPDATE: The Daily Yomiuri (whose English edition is always 12 hours behind the news cycle so this may be moot) reports that the leave to come home isn't exactly what it seems as first. Quoting this morning's paper:
He (Kim) also said that North Koreans responsible for the abductions would be punished.
A North Korean Foreign Ministry spokesman said that North Korea is considering allowing the survivors to return to Japan temporarily.
Fuckfaces. How can you admit you did something wrong, promise to punish those who did it and then announce that you'll keep on doing the action you just condemned!?! Amazing. And in the interest of moving relations along Japan will accept this...
UPDATE II: The on-line edition is a heavily edited version of the print edition and the second paragraph (the one about maybe allowing the illegally detained to return temporarily) of the above quote was missing on the web site. Whether that means the North Korean position has changed, the Yomiuri mistranslated their source or it was edited for space, I don't know.
100 year old driver re-ups his license; he's good until 106 now. It's stories like this that make me miss living in Florida. Be sure to check out the pic... talk about hale and hearty; that guy doesn't look a day over 85! (seriously) "The centenarian is among about 63,000 licensed drivers in the state who are 90 or older. ... But any efforts to test Florida drivers have traditionally met with tough resistance by older motorists -- a strong voting bloc." You don't say.
Here we don't have to worry about the elderly driving; it's their damn bicycles. Credit where it's due: Japan's elderly are a healthy, but perhaps often bowed, lot. And they keep using bikes for transportation up til they can no longer walk.. and then some. But when people hit 75 they feel the urge to stop using the edge of the road when cycling and start pedaling in the *middle* of the freaking street... sometimes approaching speeds of 5 or 6 miles an hour. It's common to see cars and trucks backed up for several hundred yards with the parades being led by lone, deaf, perhaps blind, obviously oblivious 75+ year old cyclists.
At the risk of sounding like FARK... Pit Bull being transported by 757 escapes his kennel in the forward bin. Hilarity ensues. As the photo series points out, "After the dog chewed through reinforced fiberglass he chewed through wires and the flight subsequently lost TCAS (Traffic and Collision Avoidance System) , both ATC transponders and a VHF/VOR receiver. "
"No, I don't have any weapons or sharp objects; I just wanna check this live animal that's been bred over hundreds of generations to be insanely aggressive and lethal. And then I want to enclose him in a small plastic box secured with a thin piece of metal and coop him up in the dark, unfamiliar, loud and stress-inducing environment of your aircraft's hold. M'Kay?"
(and before you ask, no, i don't often visit the artbell.com site. i only go there for my crop circle translations.)
Monday, September 16, 2002 War! Good God, Y'all. What Is It Good For? My Enterprise Economy colleague Brian Wesbury looks at what impact a war with Iraq is likely to have on the U.S. economy. "While The Economist magazine has said that attacking Iraq will lead to 'a massive world recession,' they are also wrong," he writes. I hope he is correct.
Maybe Rod Dreher Knows Something I Don't. I hope so, because on the day he has a very good post on libel law and blogging he also accuses Bob Greene of having sex with a minor. Every press account I've seen, including the one Dreher links to, describes the girl as being in her "late teens." Eighteen or nineteen isn't a minor.
Update:Rod Dreher admits he jumped the gun on the Greene story, which continues to get more bizzare. Turns out Greene met the girl 10 years ago.
Muslims In Space. Glenn Reynolds asks why there are no Arabs in Star Trek. Don't know about that. But if I remember Robert Heinlein's Future History stories correctly, Islam seems to be the only major world religion that survives into the distant future. At least it's the only one specifically mentioned. And I seem to recall Lazarus Long making some reference to the Wandering Jew, and his future listeners having no clue what he was talking about. And btw, the Islam of the future is no more moderate or humane that that of present-day Saudi Arabia. I think Heinlein's point is that was why it survived. The others just accomodated themselves out of existence.
Maybe I'm not remembering the stories correctly. Ron, care to help me out?
Mean Drunk.Stephen Green tries to answer Ron Paul's questions. As I indicated in my post about those questions, some of them are quite silly, and Green rightly scores them.
The problem is he uses the same rabid mocking tone to answer the more serious ones, which, of course indicates he has no answers for them. Sample:
4. Is it not true that the UN’s International Atomic Energy Agency was able to complete its yearly verification mission to Iraq just this year with Iraqi cooperation?
It is also true I told my third grade teacher, Mrs. White, that the dog, truly, had eaten my homework.
Did Mrs. White believe you, Steve? Did the UN complete its verification? Did the Iraqis comply? What did the UN find? And why do you disbelieve its conclusions? I'm not saying I think the UN is infallible. Hell, it's the UN; it may have well sent three blind men in there. But you've got to offer reasons, not insults, Steve, if you want to be taken seriously.
Evading the question seems to be Green's strong point. Take his answer to this question.
13. How can Hussein be compared to Hitler when he has no navy or air force, and now has an army 1/5 the size of twelve years ago, which even then proved totally inept at defending the country?
“Adolph Hitler stayed in power through the clever combination of secret police, death for dissenters, and megalomania. Saddam Hussein stays in power through the clever use of secret police, death for dissenters, and megalomania -- but Saddam Hussein is no Hitler.
Hitler launched surprise attacks against his neighbors, Poland and France. Hussein launched surprise attacks against his neighbors, Iran and Kuwait -- but Saddam Hussein is no Hitler.
Hitler gassed millions of Jews. Hussein gassed thousands of Kurds -- but Saddam Hussein is no Hitler.”
Right, Mr. Paul?
Green knows damn well that Paul wasn't referring to the relative ethics of Saddam and Hitler, but to the relative threat they posed.
Hitler conquered most of Europe and North Africa. He was able to fight massive wars on two fronts. Hitler had global ambitions
Saddam has regional ambitions. And he's in less of a position to fulfill those ambitions. Saddam fought to a standstill against Iran, and that was with American help. He was turned out of Kuwait pretty quickly.
Some of Green's snide answer are just bizarre.
35. Why don't those who want war bring a formal declaration of war resolution to the floor of Congress?
Because of morally suspect congressmen such as yourself, Mr. Paul, with a penchant for grandstanding, moral ineptitude, and purposeful ignorance of the worthiness of this nation to stand, fight, and win.
Listen, if Green's Vodkapundit character is for real, and not a comic shtick, he has no business calling Ron Paul morally suspect. Hell, just given his rudeness, he has no business calling Paul morally suspect.
As for the answer to question 35, what Green is basically saying is that it's okay for supporters of a war with Iraq to ignore a constitutional requirement because someone might disagree with them. Boo hoo. I thought Congress was supposed to be a deliberative body.
But then, if Green's answers are any indication, supporters of a war might fear honest debate because they might not be able to win it. Consider his answer to Paul's question 18.
18. Are we willing to bear the economic burden of a 100 billion dollar war against Iraq, with oil prices expected to skyrocket and further rattle an already shaky American economy? How about an estimated 30 years occupation of Iraq that some have deemed necessary to "build democracy" there?
Yes, yes, and yes. Scare tactics might work against gullible Texans in your district, but don’t try that crap in Manhattan.
The real question should be why is a war and an occupation necessary. Could we achieve our aims better, more quickly and efficiently through covert action? Why is it that soused pundits think that the costliest and bloodiest option is always the answer?
Update:Jesse Walker and RiShawn Biddle add their two cents to this matter. RiShawn aptly notes that "It's a lot easier to sustain the public's bloodlust by calling for an invasion of some rogue state--and yes, my fellow libertarians, Iraq handily fits that description--than discuss ways to deal with hard to track terror cells." And Jesse asks "[W]hy it is that so many people who love to fact-check self-important lefties who talk without thinking are suddenly indulgent towards the same behavior when it comes from their own ideological tribe." Both posts are well worth reading.
Well that's it; I can go home now. This is the best primer I've ever seen on why the Japanese consumer gets screwed everytime they open their saifu. Most of what's here will be old news to long-term ex-pats and econ majors but it's still a great review; and aptly named, Why Are Prices In Japan So Damn High?.
What makes Japan so expensive? Why? And does it have to be that way? What can the foreign resident in Japan do to avoid getting fleeced? There is no simple, single reason. ... Read on to find a few of the causes--
Land Prices, Rents, and Taxes
Cartels and Collusion
The Rigged, Bulky Distribution System (Or: Do you really need 3 people to wrap your hamburger?) Snob Appeal
Non-Tariff Barriers
Consumer Apathy/Ignorance
A couple of things that were of particular interest:
For a business to succeed in Japan, it needs at least 2 essential things. One of course is capital. The other, however, is control of the distribution channels, and this is where many foreign firms fall short. Japan's distribution system is a complex maze and their are thousands of regulations to follow. After WWII Japan had millions of people who needed work fast. So a system was made that employed lots of workers, though many of the jobs were (and still are) redundant. Also there are often several wholesalers sitting between the producer and retailer, each taking their cut. This is one of the principal reasons why just sending the value of the dollar through the floorboards didn't work. From Sept. '85 the value of the dollar vs. the yen fell by more than half. Yet products in Japan made from imported parts/ingredients didn't budge. The real reason was that the middlemen were eating up nearly all the savings. When the dollar hit 100 yen, the Japanese booksellers still used the old 175 yen/dollar rate, and didn't pass any savings on to the consumers. (You'd be wise to buy whatever books you want in Japan before you come, since the very same books in Japan will cost 2 or 3 times more)
... One other significant but often glossed over barrier is the nature of the Japanese themselves. This too is a problem which won't be going away overnight. While in the west people are taught to think critically and analyse, Japanese are taught all the more to put up, shut up, and do what they're told. Thinking is again a group-oriented activity. In this group is a strong "village mentality", and anything outside the group is generally secondary, or worse, ignored. Charity and grassroots movements are nearly unheard of in Japan. The ideas of personal growth, individual liberty, and privacy are not well defined in Japan. In fact, there is no real Japanese word for "privacy" at all, and the English word privacy has been borrowed (purabashi). Standing up for yourself is another new concept to Japanese. So whatever retailers charge, the Japanese just pay, no questions asked. A lot of Japanese media and TV also use sensationalism to sell, and objective reality is often trampled over. What's that? Don't you pay $25 for a melon and $18 for a bottle of aspirin?? Must be something wrong with your country's products--there have been lots of stories about shoddy or "dangerous" foreign goods...
And if your interest is more towards the cultural be sure to check out Rob's Japan Photo Gallery. Marvel at the 75 lbs. public telephones; stare in wordless incomprehension at the moldy, cracked, industrial concrete shells that pass for public universities; see photographic proof of the homeless who don't exist! As Rob quotes on his page next to the homeless shots:
"Beggars are not unusual in the wealthy socities of Europe and North America--many American cities, like New York, even run shelter systems--but in Japan there are no beggars. They do not exist." --- EPA bureaucrat Taichi Sakaiwa, in his book _What is Japan?_, 1993, pp.6
"There is essentially no poverty in Japan." --- Eamonn Fingleton, Japan Revisionist extraodinaire, in his book _Blindside: Why Japan Is Still On Track to Overtake the U.S. by the Year 2000_, 1995, pp.65
My girlfriend, who is typical in most respects (i.e. she has only a 2 year trade school degree and is fairly naive (hey, she's dating me)), actually had to be disabused of the belief that guys sleeping at stations and in parks were not homeless. She'd bought the urban myth of no destitution in Japan and always believed they were either miserly retirees who actually held vast fortunes in the bank or were just men who were having spats with their wives.
UPDATE: As near as I can place from the text and the photos, Rob made these pages in 1998 or '99. Since then there have been a few changes. First off would be the unemployment levels. The official level (meaning the fudged number) is now at 5.5% and as a result poverty is more publicly acknowledged than it used to be. (Actual estimates put it at anywhere from 6.5 to 12%; bad enough that the Japlish term 'homuressu' is now commonly used.) Also, the latest consumer trend to shake-up the mainstream markets are the 100 yen shops (what you and I'd call 'dollar stores') that have mushroomed in the last 3 years. These stores are not limited to selling the plastic crap you'd expect; they're also selling fresh foods; clothes and building supplies (admittedly in very small unit sizes). But I can attest living near one of these discount stores will lower your cost of living drastically. Another development Rob missed out on has been the penetration of the Chinese fashion retailer UniQlo into the country. Initially ignored by the entrenched retailers ("Hey, it's Chinese discount clothes; no Japanese consumer is gonna want that.") UniQlo now pratically owns the 12-39 yr-old median income demographic. They did it in three years by offering comparable quality at 1/3 the price; also building their own set of nicely designed shops to control sales and a massive marketing budget didn't hurt. Japan has no brand retailer like this (such as a LL Bean or Land's End) because all of the corporate ad budgets have been sunk into the chain department stores (Mitsukoshi, Jusco, etc.).
Things are MUCH better for the average consumer now than they were just three years ago. Most families have seen their cost of living decrease almost 15-20%; but that's also the deflationary cycle which is bad news of a whole other cloth.
Sunday, September 15, 2002 Just saw this sidebar over at FOX News.
The Beltway Boys Sun. 3 am ET
The Fight for U.N. Support -- We'll look at backdoor diplomacy going on right now.
Block text theirs. Charles, I've always been uneasy with the name of this show... now I'm frightened. "That's right, GWB is gonna dialogue w' you until you love 'im. He's gonna make you his bitch, Pootie Poot!" And the image of Fred Barnes... uhhh ehuck... n'er mind.
See No Ambiguity. Yesterday I asked whether any bloggers would acknowledge that the three Muslims detained in Florida deny having made any statements about 9-11 or attacking anything, even in jest. I also asked if they would acknowledge that authorities seem to be backing off from early reports the men were playing some sort of joke on the woman in that Calhoun, Georgia, Shoney's.
At least one blogger admits he may have been a bit hasty in condemning the men. Rod Dreher blasts a TV commentator who assumes the woman made up her story and, to his credit, writes: "To be fair, in my Corner posting the other day on the matter, I didn't consider the possibility that the three Muslim men might not have made the remarks they were accused of. Bias goes both ways. Mea culpa."
But other bloggers aren't so eager to recognize the facts may not be as neat as they'd like. Indeed, they are still hurling brickbats at the men. Charles Johnson gleefully posts that that the three medical students may not get to participate in the training program they were going to attend. The hospital cancelled their participation after receving threats against them and the hospital. Johnson calls it the price of idiocy.
His comments section is filled with posts such as this one
Anyone who sees fit to joke about 9/11 around the time of 9/11 is unfit to practice medicine in the USA. Perhaps they should go to Gaza and transport weapons in ambulances.
Johnson and his readers assume that the three men really did try to play some sort of practical joke on that woman. But that's under dispute. Johnson and his readers weren't in that restaruant. They don't know what happened. And even if the men did what they are accused of, there's a big difference between razzing some snooping patron in a restaruant and sending white powder through the mail or phoning in a false bomb threat to an airline.
The three men haven't been charged with any crime. So it seems to me the wisest course of action is to admit the facts of this case aren't clear and wait for further developments in the story. It seems to me that we should caution against vigilantism, especially since, right now, the most these men are guilty of is poor judgment. But I may be in a minority here.
Serious history geek alert. Did Japan institute the teachings of Plato's Republic? The Japan Times argues they did and the result was the perfectness of the Bushido, a perfect totalitarian regime ruled by a ruthless elite of self-delusioned philosopher kings. For over 250 years they kept the peace by terrorizing the commoners, isolating the nation under the threat of summary execution for any who left the country or had any contact with outsiders and by elimanting the middle and merchant classes (you know, the people who actually advance the civilzation; engineers, scientists, traders and teachers...). All cultural and technological innovation stopped for over two and a half centuries; but order was maintained.
Plato's Republic is not for everyone. Aristotle, his pupil, scorned it as an attempt to create a happy state full of miserable people. Plato would have replied -- with Stalin's hearty approval, no doubt -- that its aim was not individual happiness, but justice -- the happiness of the whole. The Tokugawa aim was neither happiness nor justice; it was order. Whatever conduced to order was good; whatever upset it -- even justice, at times -- was evil.
The bakufu, writes Harvard historian Howard Hibbett, "prohibited everything it did not require."
A rebellion by starving peasants, one of many, shows how committed the bakufu was, at the expense of every other consideration, to its supreme virtue. In 1651, a poor Chiba farmer named Sakura Sogoro presented a petition to the shogun on behalf of 300 followers suffering under a local lord's misrule. The lord was found guilty and punished -- but for having dared to challenge authority, Sakura was crucified. So was his wife. Their children were beheaded. It is an early instance of collective responsibility, a key Tokugawa tenet aimed at keeping the people terrified to the point of paralyzed, grovelling orderliness.
.... Tokugawa Japan was a philosophical state. Its ruling class was steeped in philosophy, its laws were founded on philosophically defined virtues, essences and universal absolutes that only philosophers could see -- hence their claim to the obedience of the masses, who were expected to recognize, if nothing else, their own incurable blindness. Tokugawa philosophers, like Plato's, were, ideally, military men trained to soar so high above the imprisoning ego-self that life and death were a matter of perfect indifference to them. Service to the state was all. Self-gratification was contemptible.
An interesting bit of Sunday reading. Likening the development of Tokugawa shogunate to the empowerment of the EU and its fear of 'destablization' is an exercise left for the reader (or Den Beste).
UPDATE: This is the 402nd anniversary of the Battle of Sekigahara, pretty much Japan's Gettysburg. It was the battle that effectively unified the country and ushered in the Edo period. And like Gettysburg it has its own cache of stories that surround the battle; tales of forceful generals, uncommon valor, stupidity, deceit... all the things that make for good docu-dramas. It also is a favorite of arm-chair strategists. If you're a fan of military history (yes, Chuck, I'm talking to you) you might enjoy this sister article from the Japan Times dealing with the details of the battle itself. And if you want more background go here.
Still not winning . . . Given the interest in helping out the hit counter, I post this link for the latest on Anna Kournikova's struggle to actually play tennis. You've got to love the name of the girl that beat her in the singles final - Smashnova!
And the pieces are clicking onto place.Xinhua News reports Japan is looking to extend it's anti-terror provision to its SDF rules of engagement. The provision was passed last year to allow Japan to participate (in a non-combatant sort of way) in the Afghan campaign. Japan will not piss off the US. Well armed and damned efficient logistical support will be provided for the US and British forces by the Japanese. Japan needs the US and knows it... unlike some European states I can think of. ...*cough Deutschland cough*
And here Den Beste ticks off the other nations that are lining up after Bush's "So you guys wanna be the League of Nations Mark II?" speech.
Saturday, September 14, 2002 Remember, J. Edgar Hoover Steadfastly Denied The Mafia Existed. So who did the FBI monitor? The "usual gang of idiots" at Mad magazine.
For those of us who grew up on the magazine, it's hard to imagine just how seriously some people took it, especially in the 1950s. Hell, the Comics Code Authority was created by the rest of the industry to drive EC comics and Mad out of existence. It almost worked. The rest of the lineup did fade from existence, and Bill Gaines saved Mad only by making it a full-size magazine and removing it from the code's jursidiction.
Of course, the FBI and rival publishers weren't the only ones out to get the magazine
The FBI's suspicions of Mad were fed by a steady drip of letters from Middle America, which make up most of the files. "I feel that this magazine is a diabolical form of Red Propaganda used to infiltrate the minds of our Teenagers to destroy the American way of life," wrote Greater Knoxville Youth for Christ. "This magazine constantly rebukes George Washington and Abraham Lincoln," wrote another who detected the influence of Moscow in the editorial office. "Satire is one thing; but to disrespect our American heritage and our way of life ... is startling to see. The leaders of our country are made to look like fools. In the October issue, you are ridiculed!"
Apologies Anyone? Blogdom was as in a fever pitch yesterday thanks to I-75 being shut down over a possible terrorist threat. Fortunately, it turned out to be a false alarm. That didn't stop bloggers from blasting the three medical students for pulling a horrible prank. Some called for the three to be prosecuted for, well, something. Their outrage was based on press reports citing unnamed law enforcement officials who, claimed the whole things was a hoax. But as far as I can, none of those officials came right out and said the three admitted to playing a joke on the woman. It isn't clear why they thought it was a hoax. That didn't stop bloggers from accepting the claims as truth. So much for blogs as the great skeptics of the mainstream media.
There's just one problem. The three men categorically deny having made any statements about 9-11 or blowing things up, even in jest. They say they woman who reported them was either making things up or imagining things. At this point, no one knows who is telling the truth. And authorities now say it's not clear what happened in that Shoney's in Calhoun, Ga. Their on-the-record statements seem to repudiate those earlier anonymous claims of a practical joke gone awry.
So will any bloggers retract their calls for the men to be prosecuted? Will they just admit they weren't in that restaurant and don't know what happened? Will Rod Dreher apologize for calling the men morons? Or will they just ignore any follow-up developments in this story?
Maybe I'm Just Getting Old. Or maybe it's just that it's 3:30 in the morning. But take a look at this week's edition of the Onion and tell me you don't think something's amiss. Apart from a mild chuckle or two (in one somewhat funny article) the whole effort just seems to reek of, "We gave it to the intern and told him to flesh out the concepts."
The lead story on Bush is a dud (Bush wants to start bombing... he's crazy about bombing hahah huh); another is about a guy whose birthday is on 9/11 and it just bums him out and sucks and all; the infographic is just lame and goes for puns and obvious targets; even the Man on the Street bit, always a guaranteed source for at least one coffee-spitter just falls flat (this weeks topic is the legalization of pot in Canada: "I'm gonna toke up, sit back, and watch the geese." , "The last thing we need is a glut of web sites explaining how, if you watch Strange Brew while listening to Rush's 2112, it all matches up." , "They're legalizing pot, plus they already have free health care and almost no crime? Now, why exactly do we always make fun of them, again?" ...and those are the good ones.) Heck, even the photoshops and graphics look completely uninspired.
Where is the biting social satire? Where is the "ohh that's so close to true it hurts" insight? I haven't been to the site in a few weeks so perhaps I my expectations were too high. After all, they did pretty much burn up the foundations of humor and wit with their post 9/11 issue a year ago; and you can't hit your marks all the time. But take a look and see if'n I'm off here.
Jokes To The Left Of Me, Jokers To the Right.Glenn Reynolds says the gang over at Indymedia are really "provocateurs working for Ashcroft." Actually, I've long been convinced that most of the people who post there are either conservatives just trying to discredit leftism by making outrageous posts or people who are simply trolls. I fell the same is true of most of the posters on FreeRepublic.Com. They are either leftist provocatuers or trolls.
I simply refuse to believe that so many people could be so dumb and so hateful. Maybe I'm just optimistic.
Before Tammy Millikin moved to Memphis she had one big question about her new city: "Where are the bad neighborhoods?"
Then she promptly moved to an area she was warned against.
"That's where the diverse neighborhoods are," said Millikin. "It's critical that I find a place where my children could grow up around people with different backgrounds."
Now, Millikin wants her daughter exempt from the mandated school uniform because it clashes with her ideals about diversity.
I've been to Memphis quite a few times, though not recently. If she truly moved into a bad neighborhood, she really moved into a bad neighborhood, not just a poor one. And in my book any parent who moves her child to a dangerous place when she has the means to avoid it, as Millikin apparently does, has poor judgment.
But that's simply confirmed by her stated opinion that bad neighborhoods are the most diverse. Please, in their own way, bad neighborhoods are just as homogeneous as wealthy suburbs. I dioubt she's going to run into a lot of people employed as, say, computer programmers or or bankers there.
I thought 'Tommy Boy' was funny. David Spade, the mopey understated guy, goes and makes a new film, "Dicke Roberts: Former Child Star." A couple of years ago Judy Tenuta, the accordian playing comic sometimes romanitically linked to Emo Philips (who has been locked in a time-warp since 1992 writing that "Meet the Parents" film over and over), makes a similarly themed movie, "Desperation Blvd." that had some scenes eerily similar to Spade's film.
Amy Stocky, the owner of a private fan web site that writes about TV notices the similarites and posts a story to wit. Tenuta reads the site and calls her lawyers. Spade calls his lawers... and sics them on Stocky's web site and her family!!
Page Six has picked up the story. It can be read in its entirety here right now; but go quick before it cylces and gets trucated.
Here's the bit, though. A private citizen writing on her private web-site comments about two public figures and their performances in public media. And that's good enough for David Spade (aka "Asshat") to sue her $1 million!
""They said that because I have no comprehension of the First Amendment, they were going ahead with the lawsuit," Stocky tells PAGE SIX's Ian Spiegelman." Yea, what part of 'shall make no law abridging the freedom of the press' did she not understand?
In fact, some free speech experts might say the same of Spade's lawyers. "I suspect what is going on here is a SLAPP suit," says Gary Daniels, spokesman for the National Coalition Against Censorship. In a SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation) case, "a very large corporation will sue an organization or individual even if they know they don't have a case. Their goal is to either bankrupt the person or shut them up." ... After reading Stocky's piece, Daniels said that while one line of the story was "problematic," the piece as a whole "seems pretty tame. My fear is that even if David Spade's people don't have a case, they're forcing her to shut up because they don't like the message."
UPDATE: Who knew? Stocky's attorney agrees that Spade's 'cease and desist' order is copyrighted material so she's only included some quotes of it on the site. But this woman has a sense of humor about the whole thing; be sure to read the 'questions' box.
Friday, September 13, 2002 Hear that knocking? That's Ed and he's got your check for $25Mil. US. CNN is reporting that Ramzi Binalshibh (aka "Droopy") is in the custody of Pakistani authorities. Yep, Al-Queda is getting it back together... thery're gonna be doing all the plotting and scheming they want on the sunny island of Cuba.
"In an audio message played Thursday on the Arabic news network Al-Jazeera, Binalshibh said he had hoped to be one of the hijackers but could not obtain an entry visa into the United States. .... Attorney General John Ashcroft told CNN's Larry King, "he's an individual we care deeply about. He tried come to the United States three times and we believe it could well have been that he wanted to be the 20th hijacker."
Hey, Rammy, you're coming now... all expenses paid.
Let's hear it for our Paki pals who know serious crap is about to go down and want to make sure we know they're on the right side!
We see your attempt at trade-pact shielding and raise you one. I haven't seen this being reported nearly as prominently as it probably should be. But it looks like the US is ready to make that trade deal Saddam struck with Pooty Poot-Poot mooty moot-moot.*
The administration immediately set about negotiating the language of one or more resolutions giving Bush the diplomatic backing to go to war amid indications that some prominent critics are beginning to fall into line.
An official briefed on U.S. diplomacy told the Daily News that in exchange for Russia's support, Bush is prepared to assure President Vladimir Putin that a new Iraqi regime would honor its debts to Moscow, including a 10-year, $40 billion trade deal.
Efforts to stroke China - which, like Russia, has veto power in the Security Council - are less certain, but U.S. officials believe Beijing ultimately can be persuaded to abstain.
And add to that the announcement that Egypt would, albeit unenthusiastically, support a UN mandated war (really rethinking that 'we don't need America's cost of repressive regiming aid adjustments' stance aren't you?). And that's what Bush basically told the august body yesterday. "You guys have been passing mandates to the point you don't realize what exactly it is you've been sayin'. Well, we just gave 'em a quick looky-thru and it seems you've already all but mandated a war against Iraq. We're just gonna put your words to action."
Who would've thought Bush could be the international Matlock?
(second link via InstaPundit. *and yes, I know I'm going to j-school hell for that.)
Islam And Women.Miriam Sufan, 46, was stabbed to death by her son because she married a Jewish man. Sufan was a Palestinian.
The killing took place as dozens stood by, even as the victim, a mother of five, called for help. But no one lifted a finger. Why? Well, Palestinians have apparently become jaded when it comes to violence against women. A shopkeeper who witnessed the killing said that at first he thought the woman was a collaborator. "You know, we have become used to hearing about women who work with the Israeli Shin Bet," he said. "That's why when the young man started stabbing the woman, no one wanted to help here. We thought the killer was a member of the Aksa Martyrs Brigades."
Kim Jong Il understands Korea's true natural resource. The ecomony's a shambles; the people are eating tree bark to survive and the country's only reliable source of hard currency is from North Koreans in Japan funnelling back receipts from their pachinko parlors. But it seems that The Great Leader (mark 2) does understand about exploiting resources to serve customer demand when the situation warrents. The Shukan Post is reporting that Koizumi will have plenty of distractions to insure his high-profile trip to the Korean Worker's Paradise flows smoothly.
According to an ex-North Korean intelligence agent, who we'll call Aoyama, beautiful North Korean women are usually put at the beck and call of visiting foreign VIPs.... Aoyama says the receptionists are told to take care of their guests' needs from morning to midnight. Indeed, one Japanese politician, who has visited North Korea in the past, said that the services of these women left nothing to be desired....
The women all come from a well-known group called Yorokobi-gumi (group of joy). Yorokobi-gumi was started in the mid-1970s for the benefit of Kim who was then chief secretary. It was divided into three groups �Eone to sing and dance to entertain guests at banquets; one to give guests massages; and one to provide sexual services....
Said an ex-dancer, who took asylum in South Korea, "The dancers all had to have pretty much the same appearance �Esmall and round-faced. That's how Kim Jong Il prefers them."... Considering the importance of Koizumi's visit, we can expect the most stunning women to be on duty next Tuesday.
Koizumi... you're a lucky bastard. Kim, wanna prop up that economy? Five words: government sanctioned mail-order brides. (Well, 4.5 words actually.)
Thursday, September 12, 2002 Huh?! I'm not a military expert at all, so I'll pass judgment on this decision. I do want to point out that the man in the photo was injured, and that's why he's wearing no shirt. CNN either doesn't know that or doesn't think it's relevant. I'd also like to say that I hope no consideration was given to the feelings of NGOs on this matter.
Ah Crap! Warren Zevon has cancer, and he apparently has just a few weeks to live. I've seen him in concert twice as a solo (once, really solo) and once with the Hindu Love Gods. All three were great shows. Too friggin' bad.
It's Alive! It's ALIVE! Just got a note from my pal Charles who's gettin' a bit worried that we're not pulling in the page views like we used to. So here's the word 'penis' being used within the context of an interesting story and a mild bit of crackin' wise. We do this for the enjoyment of you, the reader; but also as grist for the search engines.
Not happy with the length and breadth of your manhood? Feel that joke about being laughed at by the other guys in the locker room hits a bit close to home? You might soon be able to order upgrade parts. Scientists are busy growing penises (penii, peniss'... eh) in test tubes and retro-fitting them onto bunnies. "They (the bunnies) were able to copulate, penetrate and produce sperm," Anthony Atala, whose team at Harvard Medical School carried out the experiments, told New Scientist magazine.
Did I mention this story is about the ...penis? (/richard lewis mode)
Norway's gone nuts. Here"s a literal example of defining deviancy down. Just can't wait until my fellow perverted salarymen who lust after 13 year olds in tight swimsuits get a load of this court ruling from one of our European betters:
Norway's Justice Department interprets the law to mean that sexual maturity defines child pornography.... The ministry said: "...the answer must therefore be a person that has not reached the age of 16, but if the process of sexual maturity is obviously over, they shall not be considered a child according to penal code paragraph 204."
So, if she has boobies it's OK!
** Just realized this'll be especially problematic in a country where a good portion of the women never develop beyond A cups and many retain the butt of an eleven year old boy far into their 40s.
Wednesday, September 11, 2002 Nothing Ventured, Nothing Gained. My latest Enterprise Economy column is up. There's some more good news for the economy.
Television here has been full of 9/11 retrospectives and also absent of the same editorial controls that have sanitized the images for American viewers. The only American TV I get is the daily, 20 minute ABC News' World News Tonight broadcast, but something's odd. Not once this week have they showed an actual clip of the towers being struck, the fire, the injured, the collapse, the dust enveloping the city... nothing. There have been a few occasional still-store video frames but nothing that recreates the feeling of dread like the video does.
I guess ABC is still keeping to its policy of not showing the actual collapse, and has extended that moratorium to the entire incident. Japanese TV has no such compunctions. You're welcome on your own to consider if that is good or bad. But for the first time in a year I saw images of individuals clinging to the outside walls of the WTC, a focus on one shows a man scrambling for a footing... you can almost make out his face the video is so clear... he stops fighting for a second... and then oddly his body seems to just relax as if he has found a step and takes a moment to rest... and then he drops. And it's only after he starts to fall you realize that this person had just made the decision to fall. He considered it, paused, and released, and falls. And then there's another person doing the same. And another. And a couple. And in this beautiful, bright blue, September morning you're watching death dance all over the face of the building. A late summer day with a hint of coolness in the sky now rudely intermixed with wails of horror from on-lookers, sirens, screams... images of fire, smoke and office workers choosing to die.
One image that I saw last night and can't get out of my head was from a camera, probably unmanned at the time which explains why the image is so surreal, that was fixed on the towers from a rooftop maybe a half mile away after the first crash. The smoke pours out from the building in a sort of gushing brook pattern that's strangely tranquilizing and gut-wrenching at the same time. The camera is still. It doesn't pan. The scene goes for a few seconds and you watch it silently noting the ebbs and billows of black smoke... and then the second plane floats into the scene. It just seems to hang in the air. And knowing what's coming doesn't help. Still you think that plane can't do what you know it's going to do. And it does... In one moment you've just seen hundreds of people pulverized, incinerated. The fireball takes a moment to shoot out from the other side of the second building but it's size and the distance mask its speed and intensity. The camera doesn't move in reaction to this new development... the other building continues to disgorge smoke. Thanks to a year's passage, a half-mile of distance and the knowledge of what'll happen in the next hour it's as if you're watching the paces and steps of kabuki writ large.
Are you guys back home seeing this again for the first time?
The Japanese don't really know where to come down on this. A pacifist constitution, a repressed cadre of right-wing militants and 60 years of voter disaffection has created three distinct camps: the far rightists, the far leftists and the apathetic. The ass-kicking they got as a result of their surprise attack against the US pretty much informed them of how America would respond to this. This they condoned. After all, Godzilla lays waste to Tokyo, you're obliged to take him out.
I think most Japanese are happy that 1) it wasn't them that this happened to and 2) their constitution makes it convenient for them as they don't really have the option of getting involved in a war beyond their borders. There is a vocal minority opposed to the US's prosecution of those directly and indirectly responsible but it is a minority. And it's restricted to where you'd expect, college campuses and artsy coffee houses. The average Japanese gets the justified anger and understands how America plays out its role of enraged righteous avenger of justice. You piss off the Americans, they will lay waste to your land, people and government in a way that your mind can't begin to comprehend but they'll feel real bad about having to do it, They'll make it up to you by funding your complete reconstruction and societal make-over, rehabilitating you back into the world community and positioning you to become an economic superpower assuming you follow their 12 step program for recovering nations. Sort of a Tony Robbins with teeth... or something.
Anyway here are the links I wanted to share. Just a reminder that the attack was truly against the industrialized world even though the battleground was the US. And this note from Cold Fury showing that not everyone in Europe is completely consumed with anti-Americanism to the exclusion of showing human emotions.
And, jeez like I have to say this, if you haven't read Lileks today go do so now.
UPDATE: Samizdata provides a refreshing series of photos proving Cold Fury's point. Hail Britannia!
CAIR Shows Its True Colors. Once again, the groups demonstrates its sympathy with theocracy and its antipathy to basic freedoms. In an article on Hollywood as a possible terrorist target, CAIR seems to argue that the entertainment industry has it coming
Nihad Awad, executive director for the Council on American-Islamic Relations, a U.S.-based lobby group, said that not only is American culture aberrant to Muslims, American entertainment is guilty of perpetuating negative stereotypes.
Awad lived in Jordan in the 1970s and remembers watching such American programs as "Baretta," "Hawaii Five-0" and "The Three Stooges." But he now supports the efforts to suppress American entertainment in the Middle East.
"They don't want their societies bombarded by sex," he said. "I don't see anything strange about not letting such things be shown."
So why not move to a nation that doesn't allow "such things" to be shown?
Billy Is A Jihadi!?! Someone please tell me that these really weren't the latest two days of the Family Circus. And if they are real, tell me that I'm misinterpreting them. And if i'm not misinterpreting them, tell me when Bil Keane went nuts.
More Questions About Iraq. This time it's Rep. Ron Paul asking them. Some of them are quite pertinent; others are downright silly. But I doubt many will be answered.
Tuesday, September 10, 2002 Go, Buzz! Fox News is reporting that Buzz Aldrin, Apollo XI astronaut and second man on the moon, "opened a can of whupass" (that's punched out, for those of you up north) on some guy bugging him about the lunar landing. Apparently this was one of those people who believes the Apollo program was a hoax, and was being obnoxious about it.
I always had mixed feelings about Aldrin. Apparently being second really messed him up, but in recent years he seems to have gotten things together. This incident certainly raises my opinion of him a notch or two. I 've taught astronomy and space science classes, and every now and then you get one of these bozo's that needs a dose of reality. Thanks, Buzz, for doing two of the things I've always wanted to do: going in to space, and slugging an "apollo hoax" proponent.
For What It's Worth Just offering up several links that seem to smell of battle logistics and opening gambits.
I understand that this is a common practice for the US during wartime; helps insure a steady flow of motivated and trainable volunteer forces.
An interesting port of call newsnote.
And it worked in Afghanistan, so why not take the same opening act on the road?
Islam and Women. Bizarre Muslim notions of honor aren't limited to Jordan. An Iranian father beheaded his seven-year-old daughter because he thought she had been raped.
"The motive behind the killing was to defend my honor, fame, and dignity," he said.
Whoops! An autopsy revealed no signs of sexual assault.
Sunday, September 08, 2002 War with Iraq: A bad idea whose time has come. I am opposed to overt, armed intervention ("invasion") of Iraq. Unfortunately, we've painted ourselves into a corner not by events or facts, but with rhetoric, and created a situation where we probably have to do it. But I'm not happy about it. Here's a few reasons why (and why not). First, conquering Iraq will not be trivial, but it will be as "easy" as things get when it comes to this sort of thing. We will have kill ratios in the 500:1 or higher range if they actually face us in battle, which they won't. I would be very surprised and disappointed if we have more than a 500 casualties. Our technology and, more importantly, tactics, are so much superior to the Iraqi's that it will be overwhelming. The Iraqi army will fold up not so much because they hate Saddam or want democracy, but for the simple reason that they don't want to be slaughtered. And I'm hard pressed to see how the region can be more unstable after than before. I love it when Arab leaders say stuff like "an invasion will open the Gates of Hell". As if you don't have to cross the river Styx to get to the Middle
East already.
So those are not reasons to oppose the war. The primary reason I oppose this thing is that I have seen no case made that the continuation of the current Iraqi government represents a threat to the vital national interests of the United States. The only reason I can see for the thing is that the President has by now pretty much staked our reputation on it - and that's nothing to laugh off.
Here are a few semi random thoughts on why the case hasn't been made, and that this thing is a bad idea:
1) Iraq is a minimal direct threat to the US, now and in the foreseeable future, and certainly a far lesser threat than other countries. If the "new" policy is preemptive action against potential threats to the US, there are several countries in line ahead of Iraq, such as the PRC. I don't see where any vital national interest is at stake, which I feel is a strong prerequisite for overt military action. (Covert action has a much lower threshold in my view, and should be the method of choice wrt Iraq, but that's another topic). Oil? Hardly. We buy lots of oil from lots of oppressive thugs, murderers, and thieves. They want our money, we want their oil. Simple business transaction. A nuclear capable Iraq would not represent a significantly greater risk to the US than other nuclear capable nations as they do not have a direct delivery mechanism (see WMD point 3).
2) Iraq is an indirect threat due to their clandestine support of organizations that want to hurt us. However, I think in a realistic assessment of "indirect" threats of this kind, Iraq is still far down the list. The direct connection to the 9/11 attacks is at best tenuous. (Apparently, at least as good a case can be made to connect them to the OK city attack - but that's a can of worms I'm not willing to open.) The regimes that supported the 9/11 attacks, directly or indirectly, seem to be Afghanistan, Saudi Arabia, Iran, in that order. Wouldn't surprise me if the Iraqi's knew something was coming, and made a token contribution, but without Saudi money and Afghan logistical support, UBL et al wouldn't have pulled it off. We've taken away their physical base, now we need to cut off the money. That means cleaning up the Saudi regime should be the next priority.
3) As for WMD's, many evil, unstable, or questionable regimes possess them. What about Pakistan and India? Supposedly the "Bush Doctrine" is the use of force to reduce threats in anticipation of an attack. If the "Bush Doctrine" is not just a for show, Bravo Sierra excuse to attack Iraq, we should send in teams to capture, disable, or destroy those weapons ASAP. Libya and Iran are probably closer than Iraq to nukes. Pakistan already has them, is literally a heartbeat away from becoming the supplier of nukes to fundamentalist Islam. That is a real, on the ground threat, not a theoretical maybe in 5 or 50 year threat. And Saddam isn't likely to actually use a WMD, except in his own defense. He is smart enough, and secular enough, to realize any use of a WMD anywhere would result in his destruction. The future leaders of Pakistan will probably be blinded by enough religious fervor to use them. If the potential to have WMD's is cause for invasion, the actual possession of them must be an even greater threat, and should be dealt with immediately. (By the way, whatever happened to South Africa's nuclear arsenal? Do you really believe the old gov got rid of them and ANC/Mandela obtained no or constrained nuclear capability? I'm more worried about those suckers than the old Soviet ones.)
4) There is an argument to be made that the US is hypocritical regarding human rights, and attacks marginal, low grade threats we can do something about with minimal risk, and kill a bunch of third world people to make ourselves feel good while leaving the truly dangerous, "tough" cases for diplomacy or ignoring them altogether. And that's mostly true. We don't confront China, which steals our secrets, shoots down our aircraft, holds our aircrews hostage, tortures and kills its own citizens (and others, for that matter), and points nukes at us. Egypt under Mubarak is a corrupt thugocracy that we've propped up for 20 years. Pakistan is on the verge of becoming a nuclear equipped Afghanistan. There are numerous thugs killing their own people in Africa, like Mugabe. So what do we do? We rant about Iraq. Many people in the world think that the US Government, and possibly all Americans, are insane. They could understand it if we used power to push our own national interest. They could understand - and I think approve - if we consistently intervened in countries to advocate freedom and prevent mass murder. They could probably even stomach a "Pax Americana", where we effectively ruled the world, eschewing multilateralism and unilaterally and pre-emptively stomping out threats, if our power were consistently and fairly applied. They don't understand our apparently random application of force in areas that are for practical purposes marginal to our interests and rhetoric. They don't understand our almost random use of international agencies and multilateral agreements when it suits us, and ignoring them when we don't. They think that we use foreign adventures only when it benefits short term, domestic or economic concerns, and ignore the world's troubles otherwise.
This increasing perception of an "insane" America is particularly troubling to me. The world doesn't need to agree with us, but they must respect us and at some level understand us, or at least believe our actions are understandable. They don't fear our power, they fear our lack of consistency and the apparent illogic of many of our actions. At international meetings people are starting to wear "What do we do about America?" lapel pins. We are rapidly moving towards a scenario where the world decides that America is more dangerous than the various thugs running around the world, and must be isolated and contained. In the perception of many people in the world, an Iraq invasion makes little sense in the context of the threats facing us, and is just reinforcing the view that our actions are not logical.
5) The argument is being made that Iraq has repeatedly violated UN resolutions, and that fact is somehow bad and deserves punishment. SECSTATE Powell just made a big point of it in an interview this weekend. Well, we violate UN resolutions every day. Israel does it every second of its existence. Replace "Iraq" with "Israel" and using our arguments, from the perspective of UN resolutions, a regime change is required by force of arms. Of course, there is no comparison between Iraq and Israel - yet from the perspective of "violating UN resolutions" they are in the same boat. Do we really want to make that argument? Do we want to set the precedent that a sovereign nation that ignores the UN is by definition evil, and must be destroyed? I'm not comfortable with that at all.
So my bottom line is that I've seen no argument that justifies a significant commitment of military force for the purpose of destroying the current Iraqi government. ("covert" action is another matter.) The arguments that have been presented seem weak and, in some cases, counterproductive. Our obsession with Iraq seems misplaced to me, given the other threats we face. It is an expenditure of political and economic capital, not to mention lives (though I doubt very many), that does not seem justified. But we're probably going to stampede ourselves in to doing it anyway.
Saturday, September 07, 2002 Zell Wants To Know. Georgia Sen. Zell Miller, a former Marine, has a few questions about military action against Iraq. I spent much of the last week talking to members of Georgia's congressional delegation about the possibility of war in the Middle East. Here's what Miller and the others told me.
Islam And Women. A Jordanian father who suspected his daughter of having sex before marriage shot her dead in an "honor killing."
An autopsy later revealed the girl was still a virgin. The Jordan Times quoted officials as saying that, in the third such killing this week, the 17-year-old girl had been detained by police in Amman to protect her from family members who believed she was having sex. She was released after her father signed a declaration promising that he would not harm her. However, shortly afterwards, he shot her dead. So much for the value of a Muslim's word.
Friday, September 06, 2002 Unsustainable Rhetoric. My Enterprise Economy colleague J.D. Tuccille has some reflections on the World Summit on Sustainable Development.
Chicken Hawks. Glenn Reynolds linked to this column on why some men with military experience seem to be more wary of foreign interventionism these days than many men without. He approvingly notes its observation that
Military careers spent in hierarchical, rule-bound, tightly controlled organizations are not necessarily the best preparation for accurately judging the fluid world of politics at home and abroad.
Glenn has argued that military men who are wary of foreign intervention just aren't very astute when it comes to geopolitical matters.
But it's possible that they are, in fact, very astute. Having seen the uses the U.S. military has actually been put to, they become wary when politicians want to send them off to war again.
The most famous example of this phenomenon is Smedley Butler, one of just two men to win two Congressional Medals of Honor for heroism under fire. Douglas MacArthur described Butler as "one of the really great generals in American history." Butler spent decades fighting the "Banana Wars" in Latin America. But he became progressively disillusioned with his job, and after he left the service, he became an extreme isolationist.
This is how he summarized his career in 1933:
I spent thirty- three years and four months in active military service as a member of this country's most agile military force, the Marine Corps. I served in all commissioned ranks from Second Lieutenant to Major-General. And during that period, I spent most of my time being a high class muscle- man for Big Business, for Wall Street and for the Bankers. In short, I was a racketeer, a gangster for capitalism.
I suspected I was just part of a racket at the time. Now I am sure of it. Like all the members of the military profession, I never had a thought of my own until I left the service. My mental faculties remained in suspended animation while I obeyed the orders of higher-ups. This is typical with everyone in the military service.
I helped make Mexico, especially Tampico, safe for American oil interests in 1914. I helped make Haiti and Cuba a decent place for the National City Bank boys to collect revenues in. I helped in the raping of half a dozen Central American republics for the benefits of Wall Street. The record of racketeering is long. I helped purify Nicaragua for the international banking house of Brown Brothers in 1909-1912 (where have I heard that name before?). I brought light to the Dominican Republic for American sugar interests in 1916. In China I helped to see to it that Standard Oil went its way unmolested.
During those years, I had, as the boys in the back room would say, a swell racket. Looking back on it, I feel that I could have given Al Capone a few hints. The best he could do was to operate his racket in three districts. I operated on three continents.
You may argue that was a different time. Well, read "Inside Delta Force" by Eric L. Haney. Haney is a 20-year vet of the Army and one of the founding members of the elite Delta Force. I don't know what his foreign policy views are or how he feels specifically about the war with Iraq.
What is clear from his book is that he's proud of his service, especially in Delta Force. But he's deeply cynical of the uses the government made of it and the Army.
Take his reaction when informed that Delta was going to spearhead the invasion of Grenada.
Grenada? Grenada?
That didn't make any sense. I'd seen President Reagan on television about a month earlier, telling the nation about the airfield the Cubans were helping to build in Grenada, but everybody knew there was no threat in that. The Cuban military had no forces that could use the airfield, and the Soviets would never hang their asses out in such a remote and indefensible place. It was just a good propaganda mission -- socialist goodwill at work, helping a brother third world nation.
Haney argues there was no military reason to go into Grenada. The mission was done simply to show America was still strong after the debacle in Beirut. The mission was put together on the fly, and poor planning resulted in several of his Delta comrades dying.
He also makes it clear that several of his missions involved nothing more than cleaning up the messes created by U.S. foreign policy. He reveals that he and a team hunted down a group of Honduran rebels only to find they were led by a friend of his, a U.S. Army special forces sergeant.
Answers? No, I never got any answers to my questions about the mission, only orders to shut up. I did as I was told. In the private world of my own thoughts, I never stopped wondering what it was all about, if Keekee had really gone over to the Sandinistas, or if he was just expendable pawn in another incomprehensible game. I just kept my thoughts to myself as my disillusion and distrust continued to grow. To this day, I'm still not sure I have any real answers. I believe this to the core of my being: When he was killed, Keekee Saenz was still working for the United States.
It's experiences like these that cause military men to be wary when the government sends them overseas. It's worth noting that "Maverick Marine: General Smedley Butler and the Contradictions of American Military History," a good biography of Butler is on the Marine Corps commandant's recommended reading list for jarheads.
Haney's book should be required reading as well. It's a well-written book. Maybe some neocons should read these books, too.
Thursday, September 05, 2002 The South.Virginia Postrel has some interesting stuff on Southern hyperliberals on her blog. But I still think this entire discussion is pointless.
One of Virginia's readers writes
Howell Raines is a pain is the ass, to be sure. But he grew up in a place where to speak out against spitting on little (black) girls on their way to a (white) school was to risk ostracism as a dangerous radical.
Maybe Raines did. There were certainly places like that in the South. I won't deny that.
But I started school shortly after Georgia desegregated its public schools. A few months ago, I was talking to my mother and her older sister. I asked them what the reaction in this area was when Georgia integrated the schools. They looked perplexed and said, "They did it." That was it. No violence. No massive white resistance. No spitting on little girls. It wasn't that big of a deal.
In fact, blacks and whites had been mixing in north Georgia for some time. The cotton and glove mills that employed so many of the locals were always integrated. Both my mother and my aunt are in their 60s, and they could never remember a time when they didn't work along side blacks. Granted, the highest positions in the mills were reserved for whites. But that was about the extent of formal discrimination. The mills, at that time, just needed labor too much to do much more, even if they wanted to.
Anyway, what I'm trying to say is that racial relations in the South have always been complex, influenced by region (how many of these hyperliberals are from the Piedmont region and how many from the Deep South), by class, by religion (it has been my experience that whites from charismatic denominations have tended to be more racially tolerant than fundamentalists) and probably by other factors I can't think of right now.You could say the same thing about the North, as some of you have pointed out. Jim Crow and lynchings and the KKK played huge roles in racial relations in the South. But you can't reduce those relations simply to those elements.
To present some simplified portrait of The South and say this is why some Southerners are hyperliberal is to do a disservice to the South and to those individuals. Maybe, just maybe, Southern hyperliberals have thought long and hard about different issues, and their best judgment led them to liberal positions. Maybe they grew up in hyperliberal households, and their politics are those of their daddies. Maybe they grew up with an authoritarian, racist hyperconservative father, and they've rebelled against him by becoming hyperliberal. Maybe they really haven't thought much about their opinions at all. But they mimic the opinions of those who surround them. Maybe they found a nice market niche and decided to exploit it. (Dan Rather certainly makes a nice living.)
It's odd that people have a theory for why Rather is so liberal. But they don't ask why Tom Brokaw is. They know why Howell Raines is a lefty. But no one seems to think it odd that Michael Moore is a pinko. No one has a theory for that.
Conservatives' (And Libertarians') Shame.Geitner Simmons follows up on the Southern liberals discussion by pointing out the proud role that Southern liberals (actually moderates by today's standards) played in opposing Jim Crow.
In the 1940s and ’50s, it wasn’t the Southern conservative press that called for the overthrow of Jim Crow. It was Southern liberal editors. In doing so, they showed great insight and integrity.
While the conservative James J. Kilpatrick of the Richmond News Leader was formulating legal arguments in the 1950s to justify the white South’s “massive resistance” to school desegregation, left-leaning editors such as Ralph McGill of the Atlanta Constitution, Hodding Carter of the Delta Democrat-Times in Greenville, Miss., and Jonathan Daniels of the News & Observer of Raleigh were prodding their readers to step away from white supremacy and embrace a new vision for the region.
It wasn't just Southerners. Virtually all of the conservative press in the 1950s and 1960s, including National Review, was more concerned with maintaining states' rights than in ending Jim Crow. Few prominent conservatives, with the notable exceptions of Ayn Rand and Barry Goldwater, could even bring themselves to say Jim Crow and racial discrimination were wrong.
I tend to think the states' rights arguments had some validity. And we definitely lost something in the quest for civil rights. But by failing to forcefully argue against racial discrimination and by failing to offer a conservative/libertarian alternative to liberal civil rights laws, conservatives made themselves all but irrelevant and made conservative politicians unpalatable to many minorities, a situation that persists to this day.
Southern Liberals. Blogdom has a new temporary obsession. Andrew Sullivan kicked things off with a diatribe on on the alleged preponderance of hyperliberal Southerners in the Big Media. He argues these people are aggressively liberal because they're afraid their lefty colleagues will think they're hicks.
Virginia Postrel and Mickey Kaus say they're aggressively liberal because their thinking was formed by the civil rights movement, when local conservatives were really, really bad.
But I'm perplexed by the whole question. Why aren't we discussing all the Northern liberals in Big Media? I'm not convinced that Howell Raines and Dan Rather are really so much more reflexively lefty than a lot of Yankees. So why aren't we asking why they are liberal?
The entire discussion smacks of a bit of stereotyping. We know that the North and the West and the Midwest have all sorts of people of all sorts of political beliefs. Why do we think that all Southerners should be conservatives and try to "explain" those weirdos who aren't? (Actually, if you want to present a stereotype of Southerners that at least has a bit of truth, they should all be populists. George Wallace may have vowed never to be "out niggered" in an election, but he was otherwise a staunch New Deal Democrat.)
The fact is that the South is like any other region. We may be more conservative than some regions. But we have plenty of white liberals and some libertarians and a few socialists. I suspect that was true even during the worst days of Jim Crow. And those people came to their various political beliefs through many different paths.
Wednesday, September 04, 2002 Now, For Some Good News. My Enterprise Economy Colleague Brian Wesbury looks at the latest Chicago Purchasing Managers index. He finds the Midwestern industrial sector to be in solid shape, which bodes well for the U.S. economy. Brian is obviously more optimistic than me. For all our sakes, I hope he's smarter than me, too.
The Ominous Parallels. Bill Fleckenstein takes a break from playing with the Flecktones to comment on the U.S. economy. He says it looks frighteningly like Japan's in the early days of its now 13-year long malaise. And he has some words of warning for those urging the Federal Reserve to slash interest rates further.
Last Wednesday, The Wall Street Journal explored this issue in its article "One reason stocks in Japan stay low: zombie companies." (Actually, its subtitle contains the most important theme: "Near-dead firms help fuel rash of price manipulation that turns off investors.") The Journal story highlights what is similar about America's bubble and what is different. What's similar is that during Japan's mania, it was an open secret that the market was manipulated. People didn't seem to mind, and in fact, stock manipulation still runs rampant there.
What's different is that part of the reason Japan has been unable to come off the mat, aside from the aftermath of its mania, is that the Japanese banks have kept businesses alive that should have gone bust. These are often referred to as the zombie companies: "alive, but nearly moribund." One thing we tend to do here in America is to let capitalism work. The dead wood does get swept away. However, the Fed is trying to use all its power to thwart the bust that follows the boom -- and this is exactly what's wrong with its present policies. Capitalism is all about creative destruction, and booms and busts are part of the landscape. Regrettably, our Fed thinks it's so omnipotent that it can stem the tide.
Crapping Out. I'm pretty liberal (or libertarian) on sexual matters. I'm in favor of gay marriage. I'm agnostic on the issue of gays in the military.
I really, really try to be a tolerant guy. But I'd like to be able to use a friggin public restroom every now and then.
When I was in college, a large share of my classes were held in Peabody Hall, the philosophy building. (Yes, I got one of those valuable liberal arts degrees.) One day, in my freshman year, I had to take a leak, so I headed down to the bathroom on the first floor. While I was standing there, I noticed that none of the stalls had doors on them. When I asked why, some of the professors told me that the bathroom had become a notorious place for gay men to have sex. The bathroom was just inside the back entrance way (no joke) and just a few yards from the bus stop. So it was a convenient place to hook up. The university removed the doors to discourage the activity, and it had reduced it, but not eliminated it. The only reason I hadn' t seen anything, I was told, is because I had an early morning class. Apparently, the hijinks didn't start until the late afternoon and night.
At those times, you used the bathroom there at the risk of being accosted. And at any time there was no privacy. If you wanted to take a crap undisturbed and without anyone watching, you had to go over to the library. It wasn't a long trip, but but it was still an incovenience.
I don't think I'm homophobic. I've been hit on by men and managed to politely turn them down without mentioning just how lame their come ons are, much less punching them out. But I'm sorry, propositioning someone while he's whizzing is just plain rude. Ask Miss Manners.
I was young and naive. I really couldn't comprehend this. I don't know how many of you have been in a men's room. To put it mildly, men aren't the tidiest of genders. Men's rooms, especially the out-of-the-way ones, often don't smell that nice. The floors can be a bit filthy. Men are pretty lax about flushing after they finish. All in all, I didn't see how anyone could find such a place erotic. But that was 20 years ago. I'm older now, more worldly. And you know what? I STILL DON'T GET IT. Look around people! I can't breathe in a lot of the men's rooms I've been in, much less get an erection.
I try to avoid public restrooms. But sometimes you just gotta go. On those occasions, the last thing I need is finding the nearest one closed because someone has a fetish for the smell of three-day-old urine.
You'll get my Piper when you pry it from my cold dead fingers. Said it before; I say it again. The FAA is setting out the groundwork for the phasing out of private ownership and operation of general aviation aircraft. And most of the public couldn't care less. "First they came for the planes but I didn't say anything because I wasn't a pilot. Then they came for the yachts..."
"One of my fears is that they'll use one of these for a spectacular event against a large population centered at a sporting event or some other attraction," said Mica. "And that's a real concern for me."
---Rep. John Mica, R-Fla., the chairman of Congress' Subcommittee on Aviation
UPDATE: Thanks to Farker, forrest forster (Indiepress), for this link... In 1991 almost 60 planes were stolen in the south and southwest, in 1980 (when Glenn Fry's Smuggler's Blues was on the charts) 241 registered planes were swiped! ABC is fanning the flames of congressional oversight based on the SEVEN (7) planes that have been stolen sience Sept. 11 2001!!!!
UPDATE II: Heh heh ohh... That cute lil' throw-away comment I made in the comments section about the rental truck packed with explosives... I just need to make sure you all understand that I had no foreknowledge of this. Next thing you know Ashcroft will be demanding I be extradited back to the US on charges of collaboration.
Japanese Criminal Justice. I may be wrong, but I think Paul McCartney is still banned from the country because they caught him with his personal stash of pot more than 20 years ago. But these two creeps get suspended sentences. Two-year suspended sentences!
Tuesday, September 03, 2002 Baby, once you go Command Economy, you don't go back. Even while their economy is imploding the Japanese top-down bureaucratic group-think can't reform itself of the urge to keep trying to micromanage the supply side.
The Development Bank of Japan will invest as much as 7.5 billion yen ($63 million) to help fund university start-ups, part of a government plan to create 1,000 new companies within three years to boost the economy.
...
Using government funds to encourage college students and professors to turn research into businesses may spur more private investment. New funding sources are vital to supplement a banking system that for decades has focused on cementing ties with large businesses such as the Mitsubishi, Sumitomo and Mitsui groups.
"The venture capital industry is really immature compared with the U.S.,'' said Hiroshi Miyamoto, Japan representative at Constellation Partners, which has invested $450 million in venture capital funds worldwide. "Japan has a herd mentality and everybody wants to do what the guy next door is doing.''
Where to start? .... Well, like any favorite tale, we already know the backstory(Ford Prefect: Japan is a myth. It's a bed-time story mothers tell their children when they want them to grow up to be economists.): Your public debt is 140% of GDP. Your own population forecasts show that by 2030 one out of every three people will be old enough to receive retirement funds; and that by 2060 there will be an almost 1:1 ratio of those over 65 to those of working age. And forget about the ratios cause after 2005 the overall numbers start to tank as the country depopulates at a rate that increases every year (simple pretty graph here). By 2050 the country will be losing almost 10% of its population every year. And material assests? Land prices, along with everything else, have been falling for the past decade as the country still tries to overcome the massive real estate bubble of the late 80s (see DEFLATION, vicious cycle of)
But that's the big picture. Let's just look at this stupidity. Yea, the government is an excellent predictor of market trends. Be sure to talk to all the cypress farmers here who were funded by the government to cash in on the cypress boom of the late 50s. Or Japan's emphasis of computer hardware development over software development. ("Anyone can write a program but only a few can build the box." Now all of Japan's computer manufacture is outsourced to Taiwan and 95% of Japanese desktops run Microsoft Windows with MS Office.) Throwing money away on useless public works projects isn't good enough. Now they want to "increase domestic demand" by throwing money away on unproven and untested college kids' ideas.
"Japan has a herd mentality and everybody wants to do what the guy next door is doing.'' No shit. Hey, Nippon.... konnichi wa? Okimashita ka? Pumping loads of venture capital into groups that have vague and questionalby viable business plans with no assets to secure for collateral... America just ran this experiment for you... (pets.com amazon.com aol / time-warner need more?) Do you really think your 15 year stagnated economy can really handle a start-up bubble? And what was the inspiration for this great idea?
College campuses spawned some of the biggest new U.S. companies in recent years, including Dell Computer Corp., the world's second-largest personal computer maker. Stanford University electrical engineering students Jerry Yang and David Filo formed Yahoo! Inc. in 1994, the most-used Internet search site, receiving funds a year later from Japan's Softbank Corp.
Huh?! Come, Sherman, let's set the way-back machine to 1998. What kind of dimensional time warp have you got your head stuck in? Pick up any financial paper and read about the ass-raping the tech sector has been getting daily for the past year. Now walk me through this one more time, Japan.... You want to use public money to fund development of the next Yahoo? So that... you can lose money at an even faster rate?
Monday, September 02, 2002 Islam And Women. Unlike Denmark and Norway, France doesn't keep statistics that allow us to see how many rapes are committed by Muslims. But anecdotal evidence suggests that it is a large problem. And as in Australia, these rapes are often gang rapes involving many young Muslim men. In fact, these gangs rapes are so common, there's a word for them: tournante
As Mark Steyn notes, the attitude among the elites in these countries hasn't been to blame Islam for its backwards attitudes towards women, but to blame the women for bringing on the attacks with their "provocative" clothes.
After the O.J. verdict, it was noted by some feminists that "race trumped gender." What we've seen since September 11th is that multiculturalism trumps everything. Its grip on the imagination of the Western elites is unshakeable. Even President Bush, in the month after September 11th, felt obliged to line up a series of photo-ops so he could declare that "Islam is peace" while surrounded by representatives of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, an organization which objected, on the grounds of "ethnic and religious stereotyping," to the prosecution of two men in Chicago for the "honour killing" of their female cousin.
Shop talk. Chuck, I noticed on your site that Savannah has developed it's own personal hurricane this year. I know this has been a slow season for you in the Atlantic (as Wm. Grey and his gang continue to reforecast/downgrade the number of named storms for 2002 (started out at 11 or so and is now being recast around 8 -- wish I could update my predictions during football games (oh, and be sure to check out the first link for the cutesy "MS clip art" editorial cartoon that shows our predictions are in no way influenced by our political opinions)) -- but has anyone noticed the butt-kicking we're getting over here in the NW Pacific? These guys (gotta love their logo, took 'em what, a half hour with MS Word?) are claiming a 20-30% increase in typhoon formation for 2002.
Now I know formation, duration and strength are entirely different concepts, heck just ask my girlfriend (sha-boom! Thanks, I'll be here all week; enjoy the buffet.) But apart from Japan being a disaster waiting to happen, what does TAOS say about our 2002 season?
Why do they hate us?Harvard Magazine considers this striking commentary that informs the dialogue. On chatboards it's more correctly known as 'trolling.' Noel Ignatiev, who has a Master's in Education (oh, you too?... from the 'takes one to know one' dept.: there's damn near no value in those things. no effort to acquire / no research or deep thought required) and a PhD. from Harvard takes us to task for... uhh. for being white. As he states in his screed, "Get Whitey!"... sorry, I mean "Abolish the White Race" (like there's any difference):
The goal of abolishing the white race is on its face so desirable that some may find it hard to believe that it could incur any opposition other than from committed white supremacists. Of course we expected bewilderment from people who still think of race as biology. We frequently get letters accusing us of being "racists," just like the KKK, and have even been called a "hate group." ...
Really? How uncultured of ignorant white people to not wallow in self-loathing and flagellation based solely on their ethnicity. But, wait, this is 'race as a social construct' so it's OK. Like if I said we should Abolish the Black Race because it demeans the value of education, subjugates women to the status of sexual property and encourages belief in entitlement as a result of black ethnicity. Hey, this is kind of fun... I get to define your race by my bigoted preconceptions, despise you based on your ethnic ties to the social construct / racial predispositions I've just created out of my ass, and get to do it all under the cover of academic dogma cause some guilt ridden, upper class academics give my hatred a pass.
He concludes with the following, just in case you didn't quite get the message:
Every group within white America has at one time or another advanced its particular and narrowly defined interests at the expense of black people as a race. That applies to labor unionists, ethnic groups, college students, schoolteachers, taxpayers, and white women. .... The editors meant it when they replied to a reader, "Make no mistake about it: we intend to keep bashing the dead white males, and the live ones, and the females too, until the social construct known as 'the white race' is destroyed—not 'deconstructed' but destroyed."
Sunday, September 01, 2002 Collision Course. While I don't believe that FDR knew in advance that Pearl Harbor would be attacked, I am sure that he knew that his policies in East Asia were likely to provoke the Japanese into some action. I've often wondered why he seemed so ready to engage the Japanese. A new book may provide the answer, or at least part of it. "Sacred Secrets" uses recently declassified sources to show the extent of Soviet influence on American policy in the '30s and '40s.
A review today in the Washington Times touches on one fascinating point of influence.
"The influence of American pro-Communist ideologues in the government heightened tensions that brought about the war between Japan and the United States," the authors assert.
The Soviet dictator Joseph Stalin feared being drawn into a two-front war with Germany and Japan; hence it was essential to turn Tokyo's attentions elsewhere. The Soviets dispatched an intelligence operative to Washington, where he met with Harry Dexter White, a high Treasury Department official, at the Old Ebbitt Grill.
White had been under the control of GRU (Red Army intelligence) since the early 1930s, and he willingly followed Soviet instructions. Over the next month, in his role as a key economic adviser, White steered the Roosevelt administration into bargaining demands that he knew the Japanese would not accept, chiefly withdrawal of their troops from China and Manchuria and "an end to expansionism." He also urged an oil embargo — a taunt that led to the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor.
Given Japan's very real expansionism, perhaps a war between the U.S. and Japan was inevitable. But the timing certainly wasn't.
And speaking of which... Grock Smash! Should he decide to seek nomination in '04 I think Sen. Gronk has a message most Americans want to hear. I grok Gronk!
(...except for that bit about the minimum wage hike...)
Pasta! Pasta! PASTA!! Josh Boruff over at Something Awful is channeling the mind of Larry King... poor man. Josh, for some reason, has been reading Larry's column / blog / senile spittle, King's Things, regularly for the past few months -- which is the sort of mental torture most decent societies reserve for pedophiles and deconstructionists. As Josh describes it, "If you aren't familiar with this hellish exercise in mind abuse, Larry basically writes down a handful of random and insanely asinine thoughts that should never have escaped the mud encrusted walls of his skull."
Sounds pretty much like the stuff USAToday use to pay him for.
"I've been reading King's Things for a while, and I feel as if though I am becoming dumber as a result. Why? Almost every comment of his is strategically designed to make you think. The only problem is that they are stupid comments, and so you end up thinking about stupid things. " He then goes on to offer some Larryesque / Jack Handyish Deep Thoughts:
If God gave us the telephone book instead of the Bible, would people kill each other over area codes?
Why aren't people climbing trees anymore? Are they afraid to find out what's up at the top?
Ever since I was a kid, I've always glanced at Italy whenever I'm near a globe.
No matter how many times people try to tell me that it's wonderful, I still don't see the need for scenery.
There are more at the site and I urge you to read the whole thing. But the chance to actually get inside of Larry's brain (Marvin: It amazes me that you can live in anything so small.) is too seductive. Try a few... breaks the ice at parties...
+ Wouldn't it be great if radio stations were forced to announce "Take gap; make gap." every minute during rush hour?"
+ Why can't I get cottage cheese delivered on Tuesday morning anymore?
+ Every house has it's own smell. I wonder what people think of when they smell mine?
+ Boy, the Japanese sure like rice, don't they? (...I'll stop now.)
Saturday, August 31, 2002 Arab News Imitates The Onion. That was my first thought when I read this article. But no, the Muslim World League actually thinks Islam can teach us something about respecting women. "It would be better for the contemporary world to benefit from the rules pertaining to affairs of women and family as advocated by Islam 14 centuries ago," said Abdul-Rahman Al-Zeid.
That would come as news to more than a dozen young girls in Australia. And to Nigeria's Amina Lawal. And to many women in Denmark. Or to just about any woman in Pakistan. Or to the women of Norway.
My Friends, THIS is what computers and the internet are for. I personally can think of no higher purpose for 95% of the computer languages represented therein. (Note: if you don't know what ALGOL-68 or SNOBOL is, you may not realize what a monumental achievement this site is.)
Muslim Gang Rape Rampage Continues. Five men -- all brothers -- have been arrested in Australia for rapes of six different victims. All of the victims were under the age of 18. One of the brothers, a 23-year-old, was arrested at Melbourne international airport as he was about to board a flight to his native Pakistan. Police investigating the crime found evidence that there may be even more victims than the ones they've identified so far. For more on the link between Islam and rape, check out this previous post.
Friday, August 30, 2002 Bursting Bubbles. Doug Noland has a fascinating (and very pessimistic) analysis of the economy on the Prudent Bear site. I can't add much to it. But I would like to highlight one section
First of all, it is flawed to place stock market Bubbles at the epicenter of economic analysis. The U.S. equity Bubble was only one (conspicuous) component of the ongoing Great Credit Bubble. It is, moreover, simply failed doctrine for Dr. Greenspan to completely disregard the Credit system when discussing asset Bubbles, especially considering the revolutionary developments and unprecedented expansion experienced over the past decade. Not once in Greenspan’s speech does he use the word “Credit.” There is no mention of lending excess, money or Credit expansion, destabilizing speculation, the overly aggressive financial sector, or the expansive mortgage finance super-industry. No mention of junk bonds, agency debt, mortgage or asset-backed securities, bank loans, or other Credit instruments that provided the purchasing power for the boom now turning bust. After shunning his responsibility for protecting the stability of our financial system, Dr. Greenspan would today like us to believe that it was outside of the control of the Fed to prevent the stock market Bubble. While we would certainly dispute this point, we in the past did write that to get the developing Bubble under control would have required only three phone calls - and they would have been local calls to leading instigators of Credit excess, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and the Federal Home Loan Bank System. A few additional New York calls to speak with Goldman, Merrill, JPMorganChase, Morgan Stanley, and Citigroup could have worked wonders.
These institutions evolved into the core of an expansive and uncontrolled Credit mechanism and Chairman Greenspan had a courtside seat next to the players (the coach or the trainer?). Any analysis that ignores the key role played by the ballooning financial sector and leveraged speculation is a disservice and intellectual injustice. Greenspan goes so far as to state, “It is generally the changing risk preferences of investors, not of corporate managers, that govern the mix of risk investment in an economy… To be sure, managers’ personal sense of risk aversion can sometimes influence the capital investment process, but it is probably a secondary effect relative to the vagaries of investor psychology.”
No way; this is erroneous analysis. An uncontrolled Credit system and monetary excess will reward risk-taking, reckless spending, and destabilizing speculation, while nurturing the resulting financial and economic maladjustments. Monetary recklessness ensures the unstable vagaries of the marketplace, and propels the dominance of speculators over true investors throughout the equity, Credit and currency markets. The responsibility of financial and economic instability lies first and foremost with the accommodative Federal Reserve and the ungoverned financial sector, not “the vagaries of investor psychology.” Have we learned nothing from history?
Screw Youth. That's ESPN's motto as its "X Games" franchise sinks. I've got to say that "Fish On..." sounds like the perfect job, if only I were attractive.
Cart. Horse. Could you guys please tell me how this story is getting play on American TV? Just when you think the 'blame America first' crowd had perhaps run dry on rhetoric now, through the magic of non-contextual historical revisonism, The Independent is reporting that America "fired the first shot" (i.e. we started the whole thing) at Pearl Harbor. Trigger happy, country music listenin', bible thumpin' yahoos precipitated the human slaughter that was the Pacific War by firing on a sub of the Japanese Navy that had, theretofor, not exhibited any hostile intent. 'cept being the first wave of an assult fleet executing part of pre-planned attack an' all.
Please tell me that I'm misreading the characterization here...
Totally Stupid Agency This is, in a way, related to Charles' post below on why the founders feared democracy. The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) is going to make the FAA post Temporary Flight Restrictions on Sept. 11th. Naturally, they are going to ban small aircraft that can't do much if any damage while allowing large, passerger filled aircraft and, get this, FOREIGN AIRCRAFT to fly normally.
This is, of course, in keeping with the policy of not bothering males of middle eastern origin (it might offend them) while rousting old women, infants, and Medal of Honor winners ("You can't have that - it has sharp edges and could be used as a weapon.")
So I have to park my 2800 pound Piper 50 miles from the beltway and rent a car to drive in for a meeting, but EgyptAir flies right on in to Regan National (15 second flight time from the Pentagon and White House) with a 727. Makes perfect sense to me.
Thursday, August 29, 2002 This Is Why The Founders Feared Democracy. Some 49% of Americans think the First Amendment goes too far, a total about 10 points higher than in 2001.
"Many Americans view these fundamental freedoms as possible obstacles in the war on terrorism," said Ken Paulson, executive director of the First Amendment Center, based in Arlington, Va., which commissioned the survey. Almost half also said the media has been too aggressive in asking the government questions about the war on terrorism.
I guess some people need to be reminded of Thomas Jefferson's statment that
[W]ere it left to me to decide whether we should have a government without newspapers, or newspapers without a government, I should not hesitate a moment to prefer the latter.
Or of Benjamin Frankin's view that
Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
The sad thing is that the way things are going, we may indeed wind up with neither.
Damn. Wish I Owned A Radio Station Or Two. My pal Jesse Walker forwards this message from Hag.
I would like to host my own radio talk show. Does anyone care? Would anyone like to sponsor my efforts? Does anyone care about what I've learned about my 37 years in travel on this planet? Most of you are unaware of the things I have to tell. The information that I can share is important to the future, health and survival of all things including mother earth, the play and future of our children. Not everything can be set to music. If anyone cares to respond or help me in my endeavors, please email me.
Sincerely, Merle Haggard
merle@merlehaggard.com
I realize he doesn't have six-pack abs, and he can be a might cantakerous, but somebody take this man up on the offer.
It Isn't World Peace. But It's A Start. National beauty queens scheduled to compete in the Miss World contest in Nigeria in November are threatening a boycott. They say they protesting a Nigerian Islamic court's ruling that a single mother be stoned to death for adultery. Miss Togo, Sandrine Agbopke, said: "Stoning this woman is not right. The authorities and all of society should rise up to end this sort of practice."
Some have also expressed fears for their own safety, given that Muslims in that country have vowed to disrupt the contest. In addition to protests by individual contestants, Miss World committees in several nations have hinted strongly that their participation is far from assured.
Frank Drebbin Could Have Done A Better Job. The Village Voice has an interesting story on how the FBI damn near railroaded an innocent Egyptian student on charges of being involved in the 9-11 attack. The case smelt badly from the beginning, and only luck freed the student. But the agents responsible weren'e even lightly punished. And we keep giving the FBI more power?
See No Evil. European governments are failing to accurately report or effectively combat an alarming rise in anti-Jewish violence in their countries, according to a report by the Lawyers Committee for Human Rights. Most of these attacks on Jews are committed by young Muslim men.
Islam and Women. Muslims are only 4% of Denmark's 5.4 million people but make up a majority of the country's convicted rapists. Practically all their victims are non-Muslim. Despite that and other problems they cause, denamrk continues to coddle Muslim immigrants.
Life imitates tech-geek satire site... Chuck, this might appeal to you. Today in class (Bijinesu Engurishu Dekiru!) we spent some time talking about heat islands. As you're aware Tokyo (and it's ugly little brother, Osaka) are seemingly endless stretches of grey, mouldy, cracked concrete packed with people in roughly equal densities to what you might find in the first ten rows of a Grateful Dead concert... with nary a tree in sight. This massing of (ugly) high rise apartments, (ugly) high rise office buildings, gas storage tanks, electrical substations, chicken coops (yes.. chickens in the city), cars, auto dumps... usually all of which can be found in the same block... along with the exhaust of those thousands of cars and air conditioning units added to the naturally high humidity gives the city all the charm of taking a sauna in a backed-up retention pond.
So we got to talking about what could be done to improve the situation. I was expecting things like new exhaust regulations or rooftop garden plans. But my students mentioned something that at first I thought was a joke. Compare these two stories, the first from BB Spot and the second from asahi.com:
Lance Hatler, was irritated with the "measly 60 Hz" that the electric company fed into his house and decided he could do better. "I thought my overclocked computer system is pretty sweet. Why can't I apply the same principle to my house? I mean besides the fire code," questioned Hatler.... Next on the agenda for Hatler is adding water cooling so he can safely break the 1 GHz barrier. “There's always a network of pipes around the house. I just have to add more tubes," said Hatler. "I just wish I could find a place that would sell thermal compound in 55 gallon drums."
And from Asahi Shimbun:
Worried by the sharp rise in city temperatures during the summertime, top government experts are drawing up an action plan to try to tackle the phenomenon of urban ``heat islands.''
Suggestions are set to include incentives to persuade the owners of buildings in Tokyo to allocate more space for greenery on the top of high-rise buildings. Also in the works is a revolutionary plan to try to cool the capital by channeling water through underground pipes.
That's right... wait for it... they're gonna water-cool the city! I can hardly wait for them to start mounting heatsinks and fans to the tops of buildings or start adding those cool neon strips to the buildings and really rice 'em up. I know we can push Tokyo"s 3dMark score past 10K.
No Smooth Ride. My Enterrpise Economy colleague Brian Wesbury says the economy is on the path to recovery, but the road may have a few bumps along the way.
Never Let the Facts Get In The Way Of Your "Neutrality." From a Reuters story on documentary filmmakers in Afghanistan.
The United States accused the Taliban of protecting al Qaeda, the group Washington holds responsible for the Sept. 11 attacks.
It shouldn't have to be pointed out to anyone but a Reuters reporter that the Taliban did protect al Qaida, and the group's leaders claimed credit for the 9-11 attacks.
Monday, August 26, 2002 The Angry European. The Guardian once again shows that it is right on top of American culture with this essay inspired by Toby Keith's "Courtesy of the Red, White and Blue (The Angry American)."
We are informed that
Driving across America is to traverse a mosaic of local radio stations. Outside the metropolitan areas, two kinds of programme dominate: the God channels and "C&W". Bible-bashers threatening hellfire and fat guys with silly hats, twanging geetars, fu-manchus and pony tails, serenading purty gals, Chevy Tahoes, bars duskily lit by Budweiser neon, and the "real" values of red neck and blue collar.
First of all, guitars -- except for those played by Duane Eddy -- generally don't twang. And neither does much of what its called country music these days. (Note to Mr. Sutherland: It hasn't been C&W for at least 20 years.) I really doubt that he's been listening to a lot of radio, or that he has recently driven across country. I drove from L.A. to Georgia just a few months ago. I heard a lot of top 40, a lot of top 40 country (i.e., non-twang), a lot of oldies and a lot of Spanish stations. Then again, I kept the radio on FM. Maybe Sutherland is an AM guy.
Second, how can you tell what a man looks like by listening to him on the radio? I'll give Sutherland the silly hats stuff. But the rest of his aural observations are way off the mark. "Fat guys"? Well, Garth Brooks is definitely a porker. But just about every other male country music star these days looks like he's ready to join fitness celebrity John Basedow in hawking a program for six-pack abs. Trace Adkins has a ponytail. He's the only country singer I can think of who has one. Fu manchus? No. Short goatees and two-day stubble are the facial-hair fashions of choice for most country singers these days. Actually, I don't remember country singers every having Fu Manchus. That was strictly a rock thing.
Ignorant Briton? Arrogant Briton? Morally obtuse Briton? What's the difference?
Shades Of Gray. I met John Gray at a summer seminar put on by the Cato Institute more than 20 years ago. He delivered a couple of lectures. On Mill and Hayek, I think. I have to say "I think" because I really don't remember. Some of the lectures and discussion from that summer are still vivid in my mind, but all I can remember of Gray is that he really could have used a good toner.
I really haven't followed his many ideological shifts since then, but I know that the former Hayekian has apparently become something of a deep green who hates modernity. Here's a nice takedown of his latest work.
Friday, August 23, 2002 Sustainable Development. My Enterprise Economy colleague J.D. Tuccille has a new article up on environmentalism and the economy.
The Real Real Lincoln. Jim Epperson has put together a line-by-line list of the "errors" in Tom Dilorenzo's hatchet job on Abe.
Here's a sample:
DiLorenzo cites John Quincy Adams as supporting a right to secession in his 1839 Discourse, "The Jubilee of the Constitution," pp 66-69. On page 68 of the Discourse, Adams writes, "In the calm hours of self-possession, the right of a state to nullify an act of Congress, is too absurd for argument, and too odious for discussion.. The right of a state to secede from the union is equally disowned by the principles of the Declaration of Independence."
Adams's subsequent reference to a right of the people in the states to dissolve the political bands that had held them in union is explicitly compared by him to the revolution of 1776. But that makes it, not a legal right, but a natural, extra-legal right. In short, it is the right of revolution as found in Locke and acknowledged by nearly every American statesman from Jefferson to Lincoln, and measured, as Adams says, by "[t]he tie of conscience, binding them to the retributive justice of Heaven." Since DiLorenzo apparently does not understand the distinction between legal and natural right, he completely misreads the whole speech.
Actually, Adams's position is the same as that of James Madison and most of the other Founders. Neoconfederates have been "misreading" their works for more decades.
Lack Of Intelligence. I don't know much about Claire Berlinski, so I don't know how reliable she is. But she paints a damning portrait of the CIA.
There is an active hostility toward graduates of elite universities, and an emphasis on tests of rugged physical bravado (jumping out of planes) rather than intellect (acquiring foreign languages). Evidence of intellectual standards that would embarrass an ox pervade the endless mandatory classes and briefings: George Tenet’s recent assurances to agency employees that whereas they missed the warnings about the terrorist attacks of September 11th, they have prevented many others, and should therefore feel good about themselves, is characteristic of the endless stream of meaningless, self-congratulatory, insipid pablum in which agency employees routinely bathe and are bathed.
But the central reason that the agency cannot get a handle on the Middle East is its myopic internal security screening, a process that winnows out the most talented candidates or humiliates them so profoundly they no longer want anything to do with the intelligence community.
Common sense suggests that the most coveted employees in an intelligence service would be those who speak languages such as Arabic, Farsi, Dari and Urdu; those who have lived for many years in the countries where those languages are spoken; and those who therefore have a rich and profound knowledge of the target countries’ culture. But it is precisely these employees who cannot pass the agency’s security gauntlet.
Foreign affairs. Prospective employees are required to list the names and addresses of every foreign person with whom they have a close or continuing relationship. Someone who speaks Arabic with native fluency almost certainly has friends and relatives in the Middle East. If he has too many of either, it is unlikely that he will receive a security clearance. He’ll be required to return for polygraph after polygraph, during which time he will be abused and insulted. His application will sit for years; he will be given no information about its status, and will be treated dismissively when he calls for information. After the seventh polygraph and the second year of waiting for a clearance, he will give up. The clever candidate with fluent Arabic and a degree from Harvard will probably take a job with Shell, where he’ll be paid six times what he would be paid by the CIA, and treated with at least that much more respect.
In one case, security investigators became exercised because an employee was discovered to have visited the embassies of several Middle Eastern countries years prior to his entry on duty – not surprisingly, since he had worked for six years as an oil industry executive. Rather than joyously celebrating their good fortune in finding this espionage gem, they fired him. As a consequence, the case officer cadre tends to be full of Mormons and big, blond, beefy Pentecostals from the South, men as out of place in the bazaars as Chandler’s tarantula on angel food.
Gertz's new book Drudge is reporting that there is much concern over Bill Gertz's new book outlining intel failures surrounding the 9/11 terror attacks. One quote stands out:
"Do we really need a book for sale in every store in America that outlines our weaknesses?" asked the administration source, who asked not to be named for this report. "If Mr. Gertz is trying to embarrass the country, I would simply ask, 'What is to gain?' And where is his loyalty?"
That's a bunch of crap. I never worried about leaks, much less agressive reporting, on the theory that if a reporter figures it out, you can bet an agressive and intelligent adversary knew it last week. If it gets reported, so much the better - it muddies the water some, because the bad guys have to wonder that if it is public, is it really true?
Everybody in the business knows where the problems are. By not publishing, the only people who risk being duped are the American People, not the bad guys. This is about embarrassment, and public damage control, not security.
Thursday, August 22, 2002 When Is A Correction Not A Correction? I'd like to draw everyone's attention to a post I made a few days ago. I, like quite a a few other bloggers, talk-radio hosts and usenet posters, blasted Susan Sarandon for a stupid comment she made while promoting her new play. Only problem is that Sarandon seems not to have made it, as you find out if you read the comments on that post.
I took the quote from an article on Ananova. And from my research, that seems to be where most other people discovered the quote. Well, it seems that a couple of days later Ananova changed the article, making Sarandon's remarks seem much less stupid. And now, they seem to have removed the remark entirely.
But there's no notice that the article has been changed. I've looked all over the Ananova site to see if they've made some public apology or made it clear that they've made a correction to the article. I can't find anything. I know that journalists don't like to admit their mistakes. But this is ridiculous.
I personally would like to extend an apology to Ms. Sarandon. And if she ever decides to dump that bozo she's with, I'd like her to know I've had a crush on her ever since I first saw her in "Joe."
l33t's shouldn't play with matches. This is just a flame war waiting to happen... but cause I hunger for the "my god, i can't help but look and suffer the emptiness of a besotted soul" feeling provided by train wrecks (or more aptly, moose trying to mate with farm machinery) I give you this. Kuro5hin (as in "corrosion" as in the guy's name 'Rusty' get it?) has this new take on the inherent evil of Microsoft from the point of view of attacking hypocritical Libertarians.
The main argument is that MS acquired PC-DOS while fully aware that it itself was chock full of stolen code. And then it just goes downhill ranting about how MS lies, cheats and probably eats newborns. Look, as a PC user with a slightly above average understanding of how apps are supposed to work (Shut up, Chuck... I can hear you from here!) there have been more than a few times I wished to see Gates and his team tied down, covered in chocolated sauce and nibbled to death by a pack of feral ducks thanks to an unexpected crash or 'feature' working its way into my PC "experience." But there is nothing new here and what is here is feeble and only tangentially related to libertarian thought.
But, I thought you'd might want to go set up some lawn furniture and watch the fireworks.
Wednesday, August 21, 2002 Elvis Wasn't A Racist. Despite urban legends to the contrary. Yes, he appropriated from black artists he liked. But his favorite singer was Dean Martin, and if you've heard some of those old Sun jam sessions, he knew his Broadway show tunes. And let's not forget the country influence. One of his first singles was a revved up version of Bill Monroe's "Blue Moon of Kentucky," and his band was first called the Blue Moon Boys.
Heck, that's what early rock was -- a blend of all those musical forms. Listen to Chuck Berry's original recordings of "Maybelline" and "Memphis." You don't get much more country that that. No gets angry at him for appropriating "white" sounds.
But that isn't to say that Elvis (or Chuck) was a mere musical thief. He transformed what he sng into something all his own. I'm sorry, but Elvis's version "That's All Right, Mama" is hands down better than Big Boy Crudup's. (But Big Mama Thornton outdid him on "Hound Dog.")
BTW, Solomon Burke's latest album is great. He was always the most underappreciated of the old Atlantic roster, and it's nice to see him get his due.
Warring Factions. Brink Lindsey is a bright guy, and his blog is one of my favorites. But his arguments for expanding the war on terrorism to Iraq leave me inconvinced. Don't get me wrong. I fear that war at this point may be necessary, but we've been led to this point not by Saddam's perfidy, but by more than 20 years of U.S. intervention in the Middle East.
That's a point Brink seems either not to understand or to want to acknowledge.
Consider this passage in his post:
Here's my nightmare scenario:
We call off the dogs on Iraq. We cancel the invasion, and what's more we put an end to the no-fly zone and sanctions. Saddam thinks he's stared us down and we blinked. So does much of the rest of the Muslim world. The flight from Beirut after the Marine barracks bombing, the flight from Somalia after "Black Hawk down," our failure to respond effectively to the Kenya and Tanzania embassy bombings, our failure to respond at all to the Cole bombing, our failure (so far) to kill bin Laden, Mullah Omar, and most of their top henchmen -- and now, on top of all that, Saddam's survival of the Gulf War, sanctions, and another threatened invasion rounds out the image of the United States as a contemptible paper tiger. They don't hate us any less, but they despise us all the more. Around the world, al Qaeda and similar groups are flush with new recruits.
Meanwhile, back in Iraq, the Saddam regime continues to develop weapons of mass destruction. And it continues to work with various terrorist groups. It helps some of them to develop biological or chemical weapons. Those weapons are used in a U.S. city and thousands more die. And by now, Saddam has nukes -- maybe he's even smuggled one into a U.S. city -- so we can't do to him what we did to the Taliban without risking the lives of millions.
In Beirut and Somalia, the U.S. government got involved in conflicts that had no bearing on U.S. national security. We made enemies we need not have made. And when those enemies made us pay a price, we pulled out. Brink says that was a mistake because it made us look weak and emboldened our enemies. I say we made a mistake when we got involved in the first place. The U.S. embassy bombings were indeed terrible crimes. But I want to know why the U.S. insist on having embassies in every Third World hellhole. Does any other nation mantain so many embassies?
Yes, Saddam seems to be working with terrorists targeting the U.S. There appears to be evidence that he tried to have former President Bush asssassinated. But Saddam turned on the U.S. only after we drove him out of Kuwait, destroyed a huge chunk of his military and effectively removed a big chunk of northern Iraq from his grasp.
If I understand the logic of Brink's argument, whenever the U.S. make a foreign policy blunder like the ones he mentions, we should solider on rather than lose face in the world's eyes. I say we should think more carefully about where and why we get involved overseas.
Sometimes I'm happy this country has severe gun control laws. Such as when I had my own personal stalker (note to ex-pat guys: take care when holding the door open for strange Japanese women. You never know how your actions may be misinterpreted), But in an effort to keep the tone light let me present the following link with the obvious cap, "There can be only one!"
Nagai, who appeared to be drunk during his alleged escapade, admits to the allegations against him.
"I'd come here to interview the governor once before, but was turned down, so I came here again today," he told the police.
Tuesday, August 20, 2002 The Madness of Crowds 2. My Enterprise Economy colleague Brian Wesbury has a new column up on the state of the U.S. economy. The news is good.
War Games Redux AKA Yes, I'm Retired, but in a "Michael Jordan" sense of the word. I seem to be in the minority on this given Charles' excellent posts, and Joe Katzman chimes in as well. But I'm not entirely on board with the conventional wisdom that Van Riper is in the right here.
First, regarding quirks of various armies, here is a concrete example from World War II. In North Africa the Germans learned early on that they could use their outstanding "Flak 88" 88mm antiaircraft gun as an anti-tank weapon. They were soon blowing basketball size holes clean through Allied armor as soon as they came in to view. The British had a pretty good AA gun of comparable size. Yet far as I know, they never used it in an anti-tank role, although some of their less formal Commonwealth brethren did (the Aussies, for example). Why? Because it was an anti-aircraft gun. If Ordinance wanted it to be used as an anti-tank gun, they would have called it an anti-tank gun. The culture of the British Army at the time was such that it would have been unthinkable to do otherwise. So, if you are doing realistic simulations of the British Army in North Africa, you don't use AA in an AT role. There is no technical reason, and many war gamers chafe under such restrictions, but if you want a realistic simulation, that's how it is. The point here is that an American General will do things and employ his forces in ways that no other leader in another culture would reasonably be expected to do, and vice versa. In R&D exercise, it makes sense to use open, maximum employment. But in realistic large scale exercises you should try to simulate a realistic enemy.
As I shouted back to Charles, my gut feeling is there is less to this than meets the eye, and I think Van Riper's ego is getting in the way. In most large scale war games, there is more to being red commander than doing your best to win. It is also testing out tactics against those the enemy is probably going to use. The scenario controller has an obligation to reign in commanders who stray to far from the objectives of the exercise if it just results in chaos. Another point: just resetting the script isn't "cheating" . You can be damn sure that Van Riper's tactic that sank the fleet before it got to launch the attack is being studied to death. But what was the controller supposed to do? Tell everybody "OK, Red won on day one, he's smarter than we are, the rest of the exercise is cancelled. Everybody go home?". That's nuts. These multi-service exercises are expensive, both in $ and more so in time and coordination. You want to get the most out of them you can. So you "refloat" the fleet, carry on, and see what else you can find. No big deal, unless you have a big ego.
Monday, August 19, 2002 Islam and Women. A Nigerian court threw out an appeal by a young woman sentenced to be stoned to death for bearing a child out of wedlock and ordered her to be executed once her child is weaned.
To cries of "Allahu Akbar" (God is Greatest) from the public galleries, the judge ordered 30-year-old Amina Lawal to be taken to a public place, buried up to her neck and put to death by stoning
Sunday, August 18, 2002 More War Games. Here's an Army Times article on Van Riper's complaints.
I'm not an expert on this.I realize that a certain amount of structure is necessary to such exercises and a certain amount of "scripting" will take place. Further, I understand that reasoanble people can disagree over what the exroe should be. But it seems that the planners gave the Red team certain capabilities then after the games began told them not to use those abilities.
But to my uneducated, unexpert mind, Van Riper's charges, if true, sound awfully bad. It seems the military was not testing its concept of operations but trying to validate it.
Van Riper, who retired in 1997 as head of the Marine Corps Combat Development Command, is a frequent player in military war games and is regarded as a Red team specialist. He said the constraints placed on the Opposing Force in Millennium Challenge were the most restrictive he has ever experienced in an ostensibly free-play experiment.
Exercise officials denied him the opportunity to use his own tactics and ideas against Blue, and on several occasions directed the Opposing Force not to use certain weapons systems against Blue. It even ordered him to reveal the location of Red units, he said
“We were directed … to move air defenses so that the Army and Marine units could successfully land,” he said. “We were simply directed to turn [the air-defense systems] off or move them. … So it was scripted to be whatever the control group wanted it to be.”
Retired Ambassador Robert Oakley, who participated in the experiment as Red civilian leader, said Van Riper was outthinking the Blue Force from the first day of the exercise.
Van Riper used motorcycle messengers to transmit orders, negating Blue’s high-tech eavesdropping capabilities, Oakley said. Then, when the Blue fleet sailed into the Persian Gulf early in the experiment, Van Riper’s forces surrounded the ships with small boats and planes sailing and flying in apparently innocuous circles.
When the Blue commander issued an ultimatum to Red to surrender or face destruction, Van Riper took the initiative, issuing attack orders via the morning call to prayer broadcast from the minarets of his country’s mosques. His force’s small boats and aircraft sped into action
“By that time there wasn’t enough time left to intercept them,” Oakley said. As a result of Van Riper’s cunning, much of the Blue navy ended up at the bottom of the ocean. The Joint Forces Command officials had to stop the exercise and “refloat” the fleet in order to continue, Oakley said.
The top brass say the exercise wasn't about winning or losing but about learning. Fair enough.
But by preventing the Opposing Force from employing the full range of its capabilities, Van Riper said, Joint Forces Command sacrificed intellectual rigor on the altar of expedience. In an Aug. 14 e-mail he sent to “professional friends” — a copy of which was obtained by Army Times — Van Riper expressed bitter frustration with what he viewed as the experiment’s failure to challenge the command’s future war-fighting concepts, of which he acknowledged he had been “a vocal critic.”
“Unfortunately, in my opinion, neither the construct nor the conduct of the exercise allowed for the concepts of rapid decisive operations, effects-based operations, or operational net assessment to be properly assessed,” he wrote. “… [I]t was in actuality an exercise that was almost entirely scripted to ensure a Blue ‘win.’ ”
Van Riper said this approach ran counter to his notion of how an experiment should function. “You don’t come to a conclusion beforehand and then work your way to that conclusion. You see how the thing plays out,” he said.
Retired Army Col. Bob Killebrew, an experienced war-game participant who did not take part in Millennium Challenge, echoed this view. “If you want a true research game, one that really tests things and stresses concepts, Red has to be allowed to win,” he said.
Buffy, The Men's Sports Progams Killer? Feminists say that without Title IX, today's breed of strong female action heroines would not exist. That's news to Joss Whedon who created and produces Buffy, the Vampire Slayer.
"I was just thinking about what I felt I missed seeing when I was growing up, a woman who could kick ---," he says. "To me, her popularity shows that I wasn't the only one missing her."
I'd like to say that Gloria Goodale is simply ignorant. She doesn't know that Western myth, folktale and history are full of women warriors, from Boadicea to Joan of Arc to Wonder Woman.
But I can't. She's an ideologue who ignores facts that run counter to her thesis and willfully misrepresents things to support her thesis. She seems to willfully ignore any strong women prior to the 1980s. Consider her take on "Charlie's Angels."
Some social critics say a sea change it is: If legislation hadn't forced schools to give girls space of their own, they say, we wouldn't be seeing images of physically powerful girls on TV today.
"Charlie's Angels" underscores their point. In the 1970s TV version, the leads were sexy, but rarely taxed much physically beyond picking up a telephone. The Angels in the recent feature remake are still babes. But their physical prowess is evident, too, as they leap free of an exploding helicopter and kick male captors into submission – while tied to a chair, no less.
The original Angels karate-chopped, shot and kicked butt with the best of their male counterparts in the 1980s. And that show was a lot more engaging than the completely charmless movie.
And I've got news for Ms. Goodale, there aren't many young girls who idolize the players of the WNBA. I don't want to go all Debbie Schlussel on this. But that league is a money loser that can't attract live crowds or TV views. And I realize that the term "supermodel" is now meaningless with everyone who has had their photo taken described as such. But come on? Does she really think that Lisa Leslie has even half the public recognition, or income, that Cindy Crawford, Elle McPherson or Christie Brinkley enjoyed when they were hot?
Those Lucky Brits. Susan Sarandon and Tim Robbins are in Scotland doing some anti-American play. And Sarandon apparently wanted her hosts to know just how much she loved being there:
"You're so lucky in Ireland, England and Spain. Everyone there already knows what it's like to have inexplicable terrorist violence."
Dammit. What is the point of these war games? To look good? Or to see if your fancy strategies actually work against a smart, determined enemy?
Gen Van Riper, who was in command of the Red forces, meant to simulate the enemy, said exercise officials denied him the opportunity to use his own tactics and ideas against the Blue, or friendly, forces.
The Red forces were often directed not to use certain weapons against the Blue forces.
His complaints were reported on Friday by the Army Times, a private newspaper that covers army issues, which had a copy of an e-mail by Gen Van Riper telling his colleagues why he quit.
Mr Robert Oakley, a retired ambassador who played the role of civilian leader of the Red forces, told the Times that Gen Van Riper was outhinking the Blue forces.
For example, during computer simulations, he used motorcycle messengers to transmit orders, negating the high-tech eavesdropping capabilities of the Blue forces.
The Wall Street Journal did a piece on internal USMC games last year. It said that it was a coup for the Red forces to win the games. Commanding winning Red forces was a sure path to career advancement. That's because the Marines actually seemed interesting in finding out what works and how an intelligent enemy might respond. Sadly, that ethos doesn't seem to have permeated the higher levels of the Pentagon.
Science Proves Mickey Gilley Right. Don't the girls all get prettier at closin' time Don't they all begin to look like movie stars
Don't the girls all get prettier at closin' time
When the change starts takin' place
It puts a glow on every face
Of the fallen angels of the back street bars
If I could rate 'em on a scale from 1 to 10
I'm looking for a 9, but an 8 could slip right in
A few more drinks and I might slip to 5 or even 4
But when tomorrow mornin' comes
And I wake up with a number 1
I swear I'll never do it anymore
Don't the girls all get prettier at closin' time
Don't they all begin to look like movie stars
Don't the girls all get prettier at closin' time
When the change starts takin' place
It puts a glow on every face
Of the fallen angels of the back street bars